OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE CIBITUNG METLAND WATERLAND BUILDING ON INVESTMENT COSTS

Authors

  • Patrick Sudiarto Student of Master of Civil Engineering Study Program, Persada University of Indonesia
  • Fitri Suryani Supervisors 1 Master of Civil Engineering Study Program, Persada University of Indonesia
  • Arman Jayady Supervisors of 2 Masters in Civil Engineering Study Program, Persada University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v1i12.231

Keywords:

Risk Management, Waterland Building, Investment Costs

Abstract

Developer policy in this case PT. Metropolitan land, Tbk for the availability of entertainment facilities in the region is the right choice to increase profits in addition to selling home products. This strategy is considered appropriate because of the lack of entertainment in the area around housing which is seen from the rapid population from year to year. Service providers bear a large risk burden at the operational stage, To avoid cost overrun, in the calculation of the operating cost budget it is necessary to include costs due to risks. Risk costs are allocated to the identified risks. This study aims to identify the dominant risk factors that affect operational investment costs from the point of view of other long-running operational management. The research used qualitative methods when conducting studies on previous research which then obtained 48 risk factors that affect investment costs. Validation of the 48 risk factors was carried out by 3 (three) experts and produced 30 risk variables which then became questionnaires that would be distributed to respondents. Quantitative methods are used to assess probability and impact using a rating scale. The probability and impact values are converted into values in the probability-impact matrix, after the risk value is calculated and sorted from the highest value, 4 dominant risk factors are obtained, namely, Leaking on the walls and floor of the pool, Damage to playgrounds, Damaged plumbing systems, and Pumping machines are off or damaged.

References

Marantikda dkk. (2017). Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil: Analisis Risiko Investasi Proyek Kereta Cepat Jakarta-Bandung, Jakarta

Bernadette Christin & Lukas Beladi Sihombing.(2020) jurnal Prosiding CEEDRiMS 2021; Identifikasi Faktor Risiko Biaya Kontengensi Proyek. Jakarta

Sirait, M. & Susanty, A. Analisis Risiko Operasional Berdasarkan Pendekatan Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Pada Perusahaan Pembuatan Kardus Di CV Mitra Dunia Palletindo. Diakses (10 januari 2022), dari Universitas Diponegoro.

Sopiyah, Y. & Salimah, A. (2020). Construction and Material Journal: Analisis Dan Respon Risiko Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung, 2(1).

Suroso. Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Kawasan Taman Nasional Gunung Gede Pangrango (TNGGP) Jawa Barat. Diakses (tanggal), dari Sekolah Tinggu Ilmu Ekonomi Wiyatamandala.

Tarigan, REB. & Soekarno, P. & Rajagukguk, W. Analisa Risiko Operasional Di Divisi Network Operation Center (NOC) Pada PT. Indosat Ooredoo. Diakses (3 maret 2022)

Utomo, A. H. Risiko Operasional: Manajemen dan Implikasi. Diakses pada 10 januari 2022, dari https://docplayer.info/171709556-Risiko-operasional-manajemen-dan-implikasi-arno-haryo-utomo-se-mm.html

Vorst, C. R. & Priyarsono, D. S. & Budiman, A. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Berbasis SNI ISO 31000. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Wardaningsih, S. S. (2012). Analisis Risiko Dalam Keputusan Investasi. Diakses 2 Juni 2022, dari Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta.

Wigunanto, A. K. (2019). Analisa Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Tempat Rerkreasi dan Waterboom Di Kabupaten Blora Dari Aspek Ekonomis. (Skripsi Sarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 2019).

Stefani Switly Peginusa (2020), Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering ;Model Estimasi Biaya Kontingensi Berbasis Risiko Pada Proyek Normalisasi Sungai Di Daerah Perkotaan

Downloads

Published

2022-09-26