A Theological-Ethical Study of Church Against Corruption
1913 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 2 ) , N o v ,
2022
statement is that the word bribe is always associated with the nature and character of God who
does not want to accept bribes, bribes or in other words corrupt practices. Corrupt actions are not
only related to the issue of human moral depravity but also to God, who opposes corrupt practices.
The Old Testament book opposes corrupt practices related to bribery or bribery, not only
because of the argument of social impact (where corrupt practices harm many people). Still, it is
based on theological reasons, where God did not commit the act, reject it, or oppose it. Therefore,
God wanted the Israelites not to commit corruption. In short, it can be concluded that in the Old
Testament, opposition to corrupt practices stems from the nature, character, and will of God, who
does not want corrupt practices. It is reinforced by the opinion of Bruce C. Brich, quoted by Henky
H. Hetharia, that the source of morality in the OT focused on God.
God is the source and moral basis of the Old Testament and in the lives of men (Deuteronomy
16:19, Exodus 23:8, II Chronicles 19:7). Furthermore, Wright's opinion, as quoted by Hetharia
(2016) considers that these texts (Deuteronomy 16:19, Exodus 23:8, II Chronicles 19:7) show that
the Old Testament book is concerned with the activities of the implementation of the law that is
supposed to be fair and following the content of the law itself. However, this criticism and
exhortation of the prophets in the Old Testament arose based on the implementation of judicial
law that did not perform its functions properly and correctly, caused by the frequent bribery and
corrupt practices, so that the law, justice, and truth could be reversed (Hetharia, 2016).
Looking further into corruption, it turns out that before the Israelites became a kingdom.
When the Israelites were still under the leadership of the judges, acts of corrupt behavior in bribery
occurred in all aspects of the life of the Israelites, especially in the class of judges who carried out
the judicial process. The continuity of corruption in the form of bribery looks pretty concerning.
Even Samuel's sons, who were appointed one of the Israeli judges, also did not escape the problem
of the act of corruption of bribery (Samuel 8:1-3). Corrupt acts in the form of bribery among the
judges grew stronger until the Israelites became an empire, especially when they experienced their
heydays around the VII century BC. Many prophetic exhortations and criticisms emerged against
the glorious state of the Israelites, as conveyed by the prophet Isaiah, the prophet Amos and the
prophet Micah. The appearance of the prophet Isaiah was to see and criticize the corrupt practices
of bribery and bribery that were rampant among the leaders of the Israelites (Isaiah 1:23). The
prophet Isaiah said that the corrupt practices of corruption would not escape God's punishment
(Isaiah 5:23; 33:15) (Hetharia, 2016).
In the time of the prophet Amos, the kingdom of Israel was marked by great glory. In this
situation, it gives rise to a spirit of complacency, pride, consumerism, a decline in the spirit of
worship and religion, a decline in morals and morals, and oppression of the weak. In this situation,
the prophet Amos appeared and saw that the glory possessed by the Israelites was only an
opportunity for corrupt practices in the form of bribery or bribery and other structural injustices
(Amos 5:11-15). On the one hand, God punishes those who commit acts of corruption. On the
other hand, God also preaches salvation to those willing to repent of acts of bribery (Amos 5:14-
15). Likewise, the prophet Micah just like the prophet Isaiah appeared to see the deceitfulness and
injustice of the leaders of Judah (southern Israel).