Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2145 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Customary Villages in Bali. The customary village in Bali has been designated as the legal subject
in the government system. Therefore, it can be the organizer of government affairs and the local
community interests in the government system. Specifically, the customary village in Bali also has
Regional Regulations regarding the existence of the customary village itself.
The Customary Village Council (MDA, Majelis Desa Adat) is a union of Customary Villages
partners Customary Villages as working partners of the Regional Government according to levels
in the terms of custom, tradition, culture, socio-religious, local wisdom, and the traditional
economy at the sub-district, district/city, and provincial levels. It has been regulated in Article 72
of the Regional Regulation on Customary Villages in Bali. The existence of Sampradaya,
especially Hare Krishna, which is perceived as a threat that results in social change, human
movement makes the boundaries of social and cultural areas blurry regarding a comprehensive
society by starting with the actions of individuals with all their broad interrelationships in society.
The issuance of a Joint Decree of the Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia of Bali Province and the
Bali Province Customary Village Council regarding the Limitation of Non-Dresta
Sampradaya Teaching Activities in Bali, as one of the authority of the MDA, regulated in Article
76 in the second paragraph letter d stated that the MDA's authority is to discuss Balinese traditional
and cultural issues for the benefit of the Customary Village.
According to the theory of conflict proposed by Gramsci, social conflicts happen because of
the hegemony. In this case the existence of Hare Khrisna especially in Bali will result in the
appearance of new ideologies. The issuance of the Joint Decree (SKB) aims to consider the right
of having a religion and a belief belongs to human right that cannot be reduced in any
circumstances, in which the implementation is obligated to respect the human rights of others to
gain the orderly life among the society, nation, and state (Baliilu, 2020).
In conducting the
teachings, the existence of several Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali has caused uneasy feeling
and protest from the society in which it greatly disrupts the harmonious, peacefulness, and orderly
life of Hindu religious in Bali that has been built for centuries based on customs, traditions, arts
and culture, as well as the local wisdom of dresta in Bali.
Reflecting on Article 8 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People,
Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be forced to assimilate or have their
culture destroyed, and that States must provide effective ways to prevent and deal with any action
to destroy their integrity as a separate group. Indigenous peoples have the right to keep, control,
protect, and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural
expressions. It includes their human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, traditional games,
and performing arts. Article 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
People says that they also have the right to keep, control, protect, and develop their cultural
heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.
The Indonesian constitution regulates that every person shall be free to choose their religion
and being respect to the rights and freedoms of the others as well as to fulfill the fair demands in
accordance with the considerations of morality, religious values, security, and public order as
regulated in Article 28 E of the UUD 1945.