P-ISSN: 2808-5957
E-ISSN: 2808-6724
ijoms.internationaljournallabs.com
2141
ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMARY VILLAGE LAW ENFORCEMENT IN
JOINT DECREE (SKB) SAMPRADAYA NON-DRESTA
Putu Ulandari Sri Lestari
1
, I Gusti Agung Mas Rwa Jayantiari
2
Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana, Badung, Bali, Indonesia
1
ulandarilestari@gmail.com
2
mas_jayantiari@unud.ac.id
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Published: December 26
th
,
2022
This study aimed to find out the analysis of customary village (Desa Adat)
law enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta. The
method used was a normative legal research method using a statutory and
history approach. The customary village is the closest government system to
its territory. It has the autonomy to regulate and manage its household. The
existence of Sampradaya, especially Hare Krishna Bali is the duty of the
customary village to keep realizing the customary village kasukerta
(harmony). If there is a violation of the Sampradaya ritual in the customary
village territory, it will be the responsibility of each customary village. In
addition, the results of violantion can be reported to the Customary Village
Council (MDA), a party that can cooperate with the customary village. The
issuance of SKB by PHDI and MDA cannot be intended as something that
bond the customary village because it has an authoritative authority as the
constitution of customary village autonomy.
Keywords: law enforcement,
Sampradaya, customary village
This work is licensed under CC
BY-SA 4.0
INTRODUCTION
Every culture has values and social norms, which are driving factors for humans to behave
in their daily life. The values contained in every culture are commonly called a value system. One
of them is a belief system. The belief system is the element in society that is difficult to change
and is exposed to the influence of foreign culture. The belief system is driving force, driving
control, driving and controlling for the community action to be able to run in accordance with
cultural values and dogma (Utama & Paramita, 2021). Indonesia is a pluralistic country with
ethnicities, races, and religion diversity (Suradi et al., 2020). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic
of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as the 1945 Constitution) in article 29, paragraph 2 has
regulated that the state guarantees each citizen the freedom of religion and worship in accordance
with their religion and belief. The diversity of religions in Indonesia territory makes Bali a
Province famous for the population majority is Hindu. The phenomenon of the existence of
Hinduism in Bali does not necessarily become a social control of Balinese life. However, it also
becomes a terror in society which causes the fragmentation of social conflict
The Balinese Identity Crisis has developed into a Hindu monopoly, at least on their island of
Bali. Balinese people have identified the culture and their customs as Hindu, though they remain
two separate concepts. The Balinese belief is much an ethnic-based that must adopt a universal
religion to secure its existence (Ananta et al., 2015). By that mean, they have maintained a
monopoly on Hinduism in Indonesia as the largest Hindu adherent in this country. However, as
time flies, the influence of Hindus from non-Bali keeps appearing, and it is due to the advent of
the New Religious Movement. The concept in the name of Religion in Bali is often encountered,
or Sampradaya, which is one of them is the Hare Krishna sect.
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2142 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Sampradaya means to give, present, bestow, confer through a tradition bequeath a
philosophy, through Parampara or living lineage of purified teachers and manifests and transmits
Sampradaya through initiation (Gayatri, 2021). The phenomenon of Sampradaya ideology and
organization as well as the spiritual teachers who enter from overseas are the impact of
globalization, causing the social changes, limiting the human movement in their social territory,
and the culture becoming blurry. The shift of the agrarian society life into an industrial society,
mainly the tourism industry is the factor in the entry of Sampradaya ideologies and organization
that provides an alternative to religious practices that are more practical, easy, cheaper, and a way
out of the pressure of customs. legal system as a tool for social engineering, designed to achieve a
set of ideas about justice, rights, and process (Horii, 2019).
Sampradaya acceptance, especially the Hare Krishna in Indonesia, has experienced ups and
downs. As claimed by Utama and Paramita, the fight had truly happened in the 1980s in Bali, even
the dissemination of Hare Krisna publications was outlawed by the government. However, with
the breakdown of the New Order, moving to political change in Indonesia, this spirituality group
started to be welcomed. However, the situation is different today. It turns out that opposition to
this group is still preserved at the grassroots such that it may arise if there is a trigger (Utama &
Paramita, 2021). Hindu Community Movement (Gema Hindu) is a manifestation of the dynamic
existence of dissociative social interaction through the horizontal conflicts between community
groups in Bali. This movement is intended to make blasphemy against Hinduism can be legally
dealt with and the existence of the Sampradaya transnational ideology and organization is out of
the PHDI's protection.
After the development of the video case showing the speech of the Regional Representative
Council (DPD) of the Republic of Indonesia, Arya Wedakarna, at Hare Khresna religious event,
promoted the expansion of the Krishna consciousness movement in Bali. The response to the video
produced societal fragmentation. The rejection of Hare Krisna remains a popular topic of
conversation on social media. It goes even to field demonstrations (Horii, 2019). Most of the Hare
Krishna and Hindu reformers predict that there is a political game behind the polemic in 2020.
Although it is just an assumption, it impacts the response of Hare Krishna and other Hindu
Sampradaya people who refuse to respond in order to avoid political involvement.
Sampradaya ideology is a belief system and religion, which is also known as new religion
overseas with the term new age movement. The spirit of fraternity, equality, liberty, and humanity
are the noble jargon which is part of marketing the religion provided by the new religious
movement. These religious and mysticism or syncretism action mixes up several beliefs and
people, using yoga and meditation techniques, mystic, and individual cults supported by a touristic
religious attitude. Both Sampradaya transnational ideology and organization are believed to
subvert social order, erase national identity, and trigger latent conflict to manifest. Transnational
ideology and organization have evoked chaos that triggers latent conflict to manifest as a result of
ideology (teachings) and mixing up religion and religious communities (Kuckreja, 2022).
Dealing with globalization and tourism, Hindu people try to enforce the indigenous
principles in Bali following the instruction of the incumbent Governor and support the Balinese
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2143 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
culture, including the mandatory use of the Balinese alphabet and ratification of customary villages
through the Customary Village Council (MDA, Majelis Desa Adat). MDA regulates the customary
village autonomous institution, allowing them to enact local laws that supersede provincial or
national regulations. The influence of a cultural, social, political, and economical sub-system as
well as the influence of other sub-systems will affect a system or will be interrelated/related to
each other. Satjipto Rahardjo is referred to as Cybernetics Relation in which the connection
between one sub-system with another sub-system can be seen when the systems that have a high
information but low energy (cultural sub-system and social sub-system) regulate the systems that
have lower information but higher energy (political sub-system and economical sub-system), a
theory proposed by Talcott Parsons which stated, as a community which is related to each other
and influenced each other reciprocally (Satria, 2020).
The Bali MDA and PHDI made a joint-decision to ban Balinese Sampradaya non-
dresta activity from the Balinese customary village at the end of 2020. It is considered as a threat
to Balinese culture, so the decision passed by the Governor has caused public restlessness among
Hindus in Bali and its surroundings. The Balinese people have to take drastic measures to protect
their Balinese culture as a political stance. It is the reason the incumbent Governor of Bali supports
island-wide limitations on Hare Krishna (and other non-Balinese Hindu movements). Antonio
Gramsci, with his theory of conflict, stated that the social conflict can be occurred because of a
hegemony (Patria & Arief, 2013). Hegemony can be described as a dominance power that is
exercised to create a desired ideology and culture (Kambo, 2022).
From the results of the search that the author has done, the writing of the article
entitled Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya
Non-Dresta can be said to be new and no one has reviewed it before. Hence, this article has an
element of renewal as a contribution to the Religious Conflict Although this paper has had an
update and does not contain elements of plagiarism in it, as a comparison element, the following
articles will describe similar issues:
1) Research by I Wayan Budi Utama and I Gusti Agung Paramita in 2021 raises issues
regarding religious dynamics occurred in Bali during the COVID 19 pandemic. Balinese
community groups who identified themselves as Balinese Hindus took action against the
existence of one of the Sampradayas, namely Hare Krisna, which was under the auspices
of the International Society of Krishna Consciousness.
2) Journal with the author Rvinjay Kuckreja in 2022 raises issues regarding the formalization
of the indigenous Balinese theology and its recent interaction with a multinational New
Religious Movement.
Based on the observation, the research by Utama and Paramita (2021) focuses on Religious
Conflict. Meanwhile, the paper on analysis of customary village law enforcement in Joint Decree
(SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta. Therefore, it is ensured that this paper does not have plagiarism
elements and has elements of renewal which are expected to be useful for the development of
Legal Studies in Indonesia.
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2144 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
The research by Kuckreja (2022) focuses on localized religion and New Religion Movement.
Meanwhile, the paper on Analysis of Customary Village Law enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB,
Surat Keputusan Bersama) Sampradaya Non-Dresta. Therefore, it is ensured that this paper does
not have plagiarism elements and has elements of renewal which are expected to be useful for
the development of Legal Studies in Indonesia.
Thus, this conflict becomes the background of the issue of the Joint-Decree of Parisada
Hindu Dharma Indonesia in Bali Province and the Customary Village Council of Bali Province
Number 07/SK/MDA-ProvBali/XII/2020 and Number 106/PHDI-Bali/XII/2020 concerning
Limiting the Implementation of the Sampradaya Non-Dresta Teachings in Bali (hereinafter
referred to as SKB Sampradaya Non-Dresta). Recognizing the problem presented, thus the title of
this research is Analysis of Customary Village Law enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB)
Sampradaya Non-Dresta.
METHOD
This research used a normative legal research method. The normative legal research address
a legal issue that requires approaches as a foundation to draw up legal arguments that are precise,
logical and accurate (Irwansyah, 2021). This research used a statutory approach due to the law and
regulation associated with legal issues dealth which in this case is Customary Village Law
enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta. In addition, it also used the historical
approach to examine the background and historical development regarding legal issues faced.
Sources of legal material used were law and regulations as a primary legal source, while the
secondary legal sources were document analysis techniques, including journals, books, and articles
releted to the research topic.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The Roles of Customary Village in SKB Sampradaya Non-Dresta
The rule of law, law and regulation is not merely a form of values or norms implemented and
prevail in society. The existence of law and regulations and legislation have a significant role as
the main supporter of governance (Ridlwan & Firmansyah, 2020). All law and regulations are
established by institutions in a certain format and procedure, and is usually accompanied by
sanction and generally applicable as well as a bond on the society (Krieger, 2019).
As stipulated by the Government of Bali, customary villages have authority over the
customary villages as the closest state entity to their territory. The authority that can be carried out
by customary villages in Bali to run and implement policies in their territory is shown by Regional
Regulation of Bali Province Number 4 of 2019 concerning Customary Village in Bali, hereinafter
referred to as Perda Desa Adat in Bali. A customary village is a unit of a customary law
community in Bali. It has its own land, position, original structure, traditional rights, assets,
traditions, and ways of living that have been passed down from generation to generation in the
bond of sacred places (Kahyangan Tiga or Kahyangan Desa), duties, authority, and the right to
control and run its own household, as stated in Article 1 point (8) of the Regional Regulation on
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2145 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Customary Villages in Bali. The customary village in Bali has been designated as the legal subject
in the government system. Therefore, it can be the organizer of government affairs and the local
community interests in the government system. Specifically, the customary village in Bali also has
Regional Regulations regarding the existence of the customary village itself.
The Customary Village Council (MDA, Majelis Desa Adat) is a union of Customary Villages
partners Customary Villages as working partners of the Regional Government according to levels
in the terms of custom, tradition, culture, socio-religious, local wisdom, and the traditional
economy at the sub-district, district/city, and provincial levels. It has been regulated in Article 72
of the Regional Regulation on Customary Villages in Bali. The existence of Sampradaya,
especially Hare Krishna, which is perceived as a threat that results in social change, human
movement makes the boundaries of social and cultural areas blurry regarding a comprehensive
society by starting with the actions of individuals with all their broad interrelationships in society.
The issuance of a Joint Decree of the Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia of Bali Province and the
Bali Province Customary Village Council regarding the Limitation of Non-Dresta
Sampradaya Teaching Activities in Bali, as one of the authority of the MDA, regulated in Article
76 in the second paragraph letter d stated that the MDA's authority is to discuss Balinese traditional
and cultural issues for the benefit of the Customary Village.
According to the theory of conflict proposed by Gramsci, social conflicts happen because of
the hegemony. In this case the existence of Hare Khrisna especially in Bali will result in the
appearance of new ideologies. The issuance of the Joint Decree (SKB) aims to consider the right
of having a religion and a belief belongs to human right that cannot be reduced in any
circumstances, in which the implementation is obligated to respect the human rights of others to
gain the orderly life among the society, nation, and state (Baliilu, 2020).
In conducting the
teachings, the existence of several Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali has caused uneasy feeling
and protest from the society in which it greatly disrupts the harmonious, peacefulness, and orderly
life of Hindu religious in Bali that has been built for centuries based on customs, traditions, arts
and culture, as well as the local wisdom of dresta in Bali.
Reflecting on Article 8 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People,
Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be forced to assimilate or have their
culture destroyed, and that States must provide effective ways to prevent and deal with any action
to destroy their integrity as a separate group. Indigenous peoples have the right to keep, control,
protect, and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural
expressions. It includes their human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, traditional games,
and performing arts. Article 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
People says that they also have the right to keep, control, protect, and develop their cultural
heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.
The Indonesian constitution regulates that every person shall be free to choose their religion
and being respect to the rights and freedoms of the others as well as to fulfill the fair demands in
accordance with the considerations of morality, religious values, security, and public order as
regulated in Article 28 E of the UUD 1945.
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2146 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Indonesia enacted Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 concerning the Stipulation of the President of
Republic Indonesia and concerning the Prevention of Religious Abuse and/or Blasphemy of
Religion. Indonesia enacted Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 stated that publicly, it is against the law for
anyone to say, support, or try to get public support for a certain interpretation of a religion practiced
by the people of Indonesia, or to do religious activities that look like the religious activities of that
religion when that interpretation and those activities go against the religion's basic teachings.
Whoever commits a violation will have his/her actions terminated, if the violation is committed
by a group of organization/group/prohibited organization, therefore, the President of Republic
Indonesia has the power to ban the group after having consideration from the Minister of Religion,
the Attorney General, and the Minister of Home Affairs. The handling of the Hare Krishna Polemic
is conducted through the Decree of the Attorney General of Republic Indonesia Number: Kep-
107/J.A/5/1984 concerning the Prohibition of Circulation of Printed Goods Containing the Hare
Krishna Faith throughout Indonesia, therefore, the Decision of Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia
of Bali Province Number 006/S/PHDI-BALI/VIII/2020 concerning the Addressing to the
problems of Hare Krishna Sampradaya/ISKCON as instructed by the Bali Province Customary
Village Council to Bendesa Adat (Head of the Customary Village) or the other Designations of
Customary Villages throughout the Province of Bali Number 01/SI/MDA-PBali/VIII/2020
regarding the Instruction of Attitude Towards the Existence of Sampradaya in the territory of the
Customary Village or around the area of Customary Village. Therefore it can be determined by
Joint Decree (SKB) Number 106/PHDI-Bali/XII/2020 and Number 07/SK/MDA-Prov
Bali/XII/2020 about the Limitation Activities of the development activities on Sampradaya Non-
Dresta teachings in Bali which contained in it are as follow:
1) Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia of Bali Province and the Bali Province Customary
Village Council work together to protect every effort of the community, practice and
implement their belief and religious teachings as long as it does not oppose with the laws
and regulations, as well as it does not interfere with the peace and public order.
2) Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali is an organization and/or association that carries out the
beliefs, teachings, and ritual practices in which the implementation of the procedures is not
accordance with the customs, traditions, arts and culture, as well as the local wisdom of the
Balinese dresta.
3) Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali is an organization and/or association that carries out the
beliefs, teachings, and ritual practices in which the implementation of the procedures is not
accordance with the customs, traditions, arts and culture, as well as the local wisdom of the
Balinese dresta.
4) In order to maintain the harmonious, peacefulness, and orderly life of Hindu religious in
Bali, as well as the implementation of activities to carry out the teaching of Sampradaya
Non-Dresta Bali, therefore, it assigns to:
a. Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia in Regency/City, District, and Village/Every
Villages in Bali to prohibit sampradaya non-dresta Bali in Bali Province from using
the temples and their territory, public places or public facilities, such as roads, beaches,
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2147 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
and the field to carry out their activities; to observe, monitor, and evaluate the existence
of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in carrying out their teachings; to keep doing
coordination with the Customary Village Council according to the level as well as with
the Prajuru, or the person in charge, in the Customary Village in observing, monitoring,
and evaluating the existence of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali and reporting the
result of the activities of prohibiting, observing, monitoring, and evaluating toward the
existence of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali to the Parisada Hindu Dharma
Indonesia of Bali Province, with a copy to the Bali Province Customary Village
Council.
b. The Customary Village Council of Regency/City and District along with Prajuru of
Customary Village in Bali to work together in maintaining the sacredness and sanctity
of the temples in Territory of the Customary Village, including Kahyangan Banjar
Temple, Kahyangan Desa, Sad Kahyangan Temple, Dhang Kahyangan Temple, as
well as Kahyangan Jagat Temple, etc.
5) To the adherents, members, administrators and/or the sympathizers of Hare Krishna or
International Society Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) and their organization in Bali as
a part of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali, to be able to responsibly and sincerely obey the
Joint Decree and carry out the statement of commitment that has been made in realizing
peace and order in Hindu religious life in Bali.
6) To the adherents, members, administrators and/or the sympathizers of Sampradaya Non-
Dresta Bali as well as their organization in Bali who do not obey the Joint Decree and/or
result in the disturbances to the harmonious, peacefulness, and orderly life of Hindu
religious in Bali, may be given legal sanctions based on the Laws and Regulations and/or
Local Law in each Customary Village.
7) The community is obligated to be active in assisting the implementation of the Joint Decree
in order to maintain the harmonious, peacefulness, and orderly life of Hindu religious in
Bali.
8) The Joint Decree starts to be used on Wednesday, December 16, 2020 in Denpasar.
Starting from the existence of the Regional Regulation of Customary Village in Bali, as the
customary village have the task of realizing the Kasukertan Customary Village which includes
harmonious, welfare, happiness, and peacefulness in Skala (visible) and Niskala (invisible) which
regulated in Article 21 of the Local Regulation of Customary Village in Bali, as well as
implementing authority based on the right of origin and local authority on the scale of Customary
Village as stipulated on Article 23 of the Local Regulation of Customary Village, regarding the
existence of Sampradaya especially Hare Krishna, in a circumstance that they want to carry out
activities at the Temple/Parahyangan (Dhang Kahyangan or Kahyangan Jagat) or any religious
places in Territory of the Customary Village which becomes the responsibility of each pengempon,
or those people who have the responsibility to take care of the religious places, in accordance with
the local Dresta, therefore, the monitoring, supervising and evaluating towards sampradaya non-
dresta Bali in Bali in term of carrying out their teachings, have to conduct coordination to Parisada
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2148 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Hindu Dharma Indonesia according to the level of observing, monitoring and evaluating the
existence of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali as well as reporting the result of the activities
of prohibiting, observing, monitoring, and evaluating toward the existence of Sampradaya Non-
Dresta Bali in Bali to the Bali Province Customary Village Council with a copy to the Parisada
Hindu Dharma Indonesia of Bali Province.
The Authority Analysis of Customary Village Law Enfoecement on SKB (Joint Decree)
Sampradaya Non-Dresta
Law Enforcement is a system in which some members of the government work together to
find, stop, rehabilitate, or punish people who break the rules and norms of the society in which the
law enforcement member lives (Purwani, 2020). Law enforcement has to be done by the
government to protect society (Tenove, 2020). Law enforcement is the process of working to make
sure that legal rules work as a real guide for behavior in traffic or legal relationships in society and
the state (Adiyaryani & Sudiarawan, 2021).
In order to maintain the harmonious, peacefulness, and the orderly life of Hindu religious in
Bali as well as carrying out the teaching activities of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali, the Customary
Village has a function to realize the Kasukerta of the Customary Village, if there is a prohibition
on the ritual activities of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Territory of the Customary Village
which is not appropriate with the Sukerta Tata Parahyangan, Awig Awig (the regulations),
Pararem (the rule for implementing awig-awig), and/or Dresta in each Customary Village, the
prohibition of Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali in Bali carries out the activities at the
Temple/Kahyangan in Territory of the Customary Village and/or at Kahyangan Tiga of each
Customary Village, coordinating with the Pengempon of each Temples to prohibit the activities of
Sampradaya Non-Dresta Bali which is not appropriate with Hinduism in Bali, as well as reporting
the result of violating activities to the MDA. The relationship between MDA, PHDI and the
Customary Village can be influenced by a reciprocal relationship that have been affected by the
sub-systems, as a theory proposed by Tallcot Parsons (2017), which stated that the community is
functionally integrated system in the form of equilibrium. Even though the social integration can
never be achieved perfectly, however, principally, the social system will always tend to move
towards a dynamical harmony. To be more specific, this theory states that there are various sub-
systems in a group of community, in which between one sub-system and other sub-systems are
interrelated and influenced each other. The referred sub-systems are including cultural sub-system,
social sub-system, political sub-system and economical sub-system.
The Local Regulation of Customary Village in Bali, especially the Article 81 has stipulated
that the Customary Village in their government activities can carry out relations with various
parties, one of those parties is MDA or the Customary Village Council in which the
implementations are characterized by:
1) Authoritative is the relationship between the Customary Village with the various parties
that cored on the authority of the Customary Village in giving the verification and
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2149 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
validation of an activity in Territory of the Customary Village is in accordance with the
Awig Awig, Pararem, and/or the policies of the Customary Village.
2) Coordinative is the Customary Village with various parties in which each parties have
their own equal position to harmonize the authority or the implementation of an activity
which is related with the interest of a Customary Village.
3) Consultative is the Customary Village with various parties conduct an activity to
exchange idea in order to achieve the best suggestions or advices to solve the problems.
According to those explanation, therefore, the relationship between the Customary Village
and the Customary Village Council (MDA), in this case, MDA is not authoritative or what is
interpreted as the authority of MDA to give orders to the Customary Village, but it is the
manifestation of the Customary Village Autonomy Principal in implementing its governance,
therefore, the provisions as stated in the SKB (Joint Decree), along with the authoritative authority
of the Customary Village has made all of the provisions in SKB will be harmonized with the awig-
awig of the local customary village, so that it cannot be said that the SKB is binding to the
Customary Village.
CONCLUSION
The Customary Village Law Enforcement in Sampradaya Non-Dresta has to implement the
Kasukertan of the Customary Village. The existence of Sampradaya Non-Dresta in territory of the
Customary Village becomes the responsibility of each Customary Village as an autonomy in
conducting the governance. Hence, the SKB cannot be said as binding to the Customary Village.
Therefore, future research are expected to delve deeper into this topic to reveal more insight
regarding how Customary Village works, whether in Bali or other villages across Indonesia.
REFERENCE
Adiyaryani, N. N., & Sudiarawan, K. A. (2021). Surveillance function in law enforcement in
Indonesia: Integrated criminal justice system perspective. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana
(Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(3). https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p04
Ananta, A., Arifin, E. N., Hasbullah, M. S., Handayani, N. B., & Pramono, A. (2015). Demography
of Indonesia’s ethnicity. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Baliilu. (2020). SKB PHDI dan MDA Bali Terbit, batasi pengembanan ajaran ‘Sampradaya’ Non-
‘Dresta’ Bali di Bali. Baliilu.Com.
Gayatri, I. A. M. (2021). Gerakan masyarakat hindu menolak pengayoman ideologi dan organisasi
transnasional Sampradaya di Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia (PHDI). Dharmasmrti:
Jurnal Ilmu Agama Dan Kebudayaan, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v21i1.1670
Horii, H. (2019). Pluralistic legal system, pluralistic human rights?: teenage pregnancy, child
marriage and legal institutions in Bali. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3).
https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2019.1683429
Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian hukum: Pilihan metode & praktik penulisan artikel. Mirra Buana
Media.
Analysis of Customary Village Law Enforcement in Joint Decree (SKB) Sampradaya Non-Dresta
2150 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Kambo, G. A. (2022). Budaya politik sebagai bahan ajar. Humanities Genius.
Krieger, H. (2019). Populist governments and international law. In European Journal of
International Law (Vol. 30, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz046
Kuckreja, R. (2022). The Hare Krishnas in Bali: Localized religion and new religious movement.
Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 12(1).
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (2017). The social system. In Toward a general theory of action (pp.
190233). Routledge.
Patria, N., & Arief, A. (2013). Antonio Gramsci: Negara & Hegemoni. Pustaka Pelajar.
Purwani, S. P. M. E. (2020). The enforcement of environmental criminal law in customary law
community. Udayana Master Law Journal, 11(1).
Ridlwan, Z., & Firmansyah, A. A. (2020). Law enforcement and justice: Perspective of authority
and responsibility of the president towards the judicial system. Jurnal Magister Hukum
Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(1).
https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p01
Satria, A. P. (2020). Sibernetika Talcott Parsons: Suatu analisis terhadap pelaksanaan omnibus law
dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta lapangan kerja di Indonesia. Indonesian State
Law Review (ISLRev), 2(2), 111118.
Suradi, A., Kenedi, J., & Surahman, B. (2020). Religious tolerance in multicultural communities:
Towards a comprehensive approach in handling social conflict. Udayana Journal of Law and
Culture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/ujlc.2020.v04.i02.p06
Tenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy
responses. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740
Utama, I. W. B., & Paramita, I. G. A. (2021). Religious conflict during the COVID 19 Pandemic.
In I. K. Ardhana (Ed.), Proceeding Book of 7
th
ICIIS Virtual International Conference of
Interreligious and Intercultural Studies Living the New Normal: Achieving Resilience &
Ensuring Sustainable Future. UNHI Pres.