P-ISSN: 2808-5957
E-ISSN: 2808-6724
ijoms.internationaljournallabs.com
175
STRATEGIES IN DEVELOPING MSMEs OF PEMATANGSIANTAR
Annisa Edelia
1
, Zuhrinal M. Nawawi
2
Islamic State University of North Sumatera, Indonesia
1
nyssaedell@gmail.com
2
zuhrinal.nahwawi@uinsu.ac.id
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the development strategi of Micro Small and Medium
Enterprises (UMKM) in Pematangsiantar City. The research model is qualitative approach. The research
design is field study and literature study. The focus of research to be achived is the development strategy of
Small Micro and Medium Enterprises in Pematangsiantar city. The data analysis technique used is
descriptive qualitative analysis. The result of the study show that UMKM enterpreneurs face obstacles in
developing their businesses. The strategy of developing UMKM in Pematangsiantar City is inseparable from
the participation of the government and UMKM actors. The government should be able to provide
assistance to UMKM actors, as well as socialization and training, and UMKM actors should be more
creative and innovative in producing goods.
Keywords: Development strategy, MSME, Pematangsiantar
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
INTRODUCTION
Economic growth shows an increase in the welfare of the community reflected in the
increasing purchasing power of the community. The economy of the community develops as a
sign of an increase in the economy of the community. The economy of today's society requires
a clear and systematic concept so that it is expected to produce economic actors who have high
fighting power in carrying out their business in various economic situations.
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) have a hand in the economic development
of an area by enhancing efforts that reduce the unemployment rate (Kusdiana and Ardi, 2014).
The cause of MSMEs in an area does not experience development is not optimally implemented
the role of the government, especially local governments in growing, developing and mapping
potential economic sectors in developing regional economic progress.
MSMEs need a strategy in order to achieve a goal so that all can be controlled properly. The
strategy is well designed so that it can help the development of MSMEs as desired.
Pematangsiantar City, the second largest city, and one of the cities in North Sumatra Province
after Medan. The location of Pematangsiantar City is very strategic, crossed by Jalan Raya
Lintas Sumatra. The city has an area of 79.97 km2 and has a population of 253,500 people.
Pematangsiantar City consists of eight sub-districts and 53 villages with an area of 79.9706
km
2
(BPS Pematangsiantar City, 2018).
Initial studies found in the field to some business actors categorized as MSMEs such as the
lack of knowledge of business actors on how to raise their business, difficulty distributing
products, lack of product innovation, not having branding and lack of maximum online
marketing is not overcome to the maximum.
Law No. 20 of 2008 Article 7 paragraph (1), says that the Local Government fosters the
Business Climate for MSMEs. To fulfill the mandate of the Law, it is necessary to carry out an
assessment related to the development strategy of MSMEs in pematangsiantar city.
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
176 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
The formulation of the problem in this research is how the development strategy of Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Pematangsiantar City. Based on the formulation
of the problem, the purpose of this research is to find out the development strategy of Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Pematangsiantar City.
Regional Economic Development
Regional development has the goal of improving living standards by elaborating on each
sector both between sectoral development and effective and efficient regional development
planning. One of the indicators of the success of economic growth in several countries
supported by MSMEs that are considered to have contributed to the provision of jobs, acts as
a supplier to larger businesses (Singh et al., 2008).
The development of regional economic potential is considered very useful in reducing
development inequality between regions that are carried out gradually and have an impact on
economic progress in the area.
Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)
MSMEs play a strategic role in the development of the national economy. MSMEs are
productive business units that stand alone, carried out by individuals or business entities in all
sectors of the economy (Tambunan, 2012). By giving birth to many successful entrepreneurs
Indonesia can reduce dependence on other nations, create new jobs, and can help the
government in order to reduce the unemployment rate.
According to Law No. 20 of 2008 article 6, the criteria of MSMEs are as follows:
1.
Micro-businesses are: is a productive business owned by individuals and / or
individual business entities withcriteria for net income owned by Rp 50,000,000.00
(fifty million rupiah) in addition to the assets they have and annual sales obtained at
most Rp 300,000,000.00 (Three hundred of millions of Rupiah);
2.
Small business is a productive economic business that stands alone, conducted by
individuals or business entities with the criteria of net income as low as Rp
50,000,000.00 (Fifty million rupiah) up to at most Rp 500,000,000.00 (Five hundred
million rupiah) excluding land and buildings where businesses and businesses and
businesses are located. annual sales generated more than Rp 300,000,000.00 (Three
hundred million rupiah) to at most Rp 2,500,000,000.00 (Two billion five hundred
million rupiah);
3.
Medium enterprises are productive economic efforts that stand alone, conducted by
individuals or business entities criteria for net income of more than Rp
500,000,000.00 (five hundred million rupiah) up to at most Rp 10,000,000,000.00
(ten billion rupiah) in addition to fixed assets owned by the organization and Annual
sales obtained more than Rp 2,500,000,000.00 (two billion five hundred million
rupiah) up to a maximum of Rp 50,000,000,000.00 (fifty billion rupiah).
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Strategy (MSMEs)
Development is an effort made to advance, improve, and improve something that already
exists regularly to get better. According to Kartasasmita (1996), the development of MSMEs
includes the following aspects, improvements to productive assets, especially capital, in
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
177 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
addition to technology, management, and other aspects, market access, market information,
production assistance, and marketing facilities and infrastructure.
Especially for small businesses in the countryside, basic infrastructure will be very helpful
is a means of transportation. Doing trainings to improve the knowledge and skills needed to
strive is very important. However, at the same time it also needs to be instilled the spirit of the
entrepreneurial spirit, and strengthening about economic institutions so that the process of
running the market does not come out of what is desired which will actually lead to gaps.
Therefore, appropriate interventions are needed and do not conflict with the fundamental
rules in a free economy, but still guarantee the occurrence of social equity. Establishing
business partnerships has proven successful for the development of people's economic
business.
The first step that needs to be done in developing MSMEs is to recognize the obstacles
faced, plan a clear plan that includes goals, strategies to develop MSMEs. Increase creativity
and initiative so that we are superior to competitors.
METHOD
This research model is a qualitative approach model, with field studies and literature studies.
The focus of the research to be achieved is the development strategy of Small, Micro and
Medium Enterprises in Pematangsiantar City. The research site is Pematangsiantar City. Data
collection conducted using techniques is observation, interview, and documentation. Data
analysis techniques with qualitative descriptive.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
MSME Conditions in Pematangsiantar City
Efforts to achieve equitable economic development are needed policies that tend as much
as possible based on the potential of buildings owned by each region (Herdhiansyah, et al,
2013). The role of the government to control the existence of MSMEs is crucial considering
that MSMEs in some cities or regions greatly affect the economy of the area.
Along with the improvement of the regional and national economy, the economic growth
of Pematangsiantar City is also getting better. Business actors who grow in the city of
Pematangsiantar majority are micro and small scale. Some micro and small businesses found
throughout the sub-district are still not optimal in entrepreneurship so it is not uncommon for
some of these business actors to often experience setbacks in entrepreneurship and eventually
close their businesses.
Business actors in Pematangsiantar City consist of micro, small and medium enterprises
spread across 8 sub-districts, namely East Siantar, West Siantar, North Siantar, South Siantar,
Siantar Marihat, Siantar Martoba, Siantar Sitalasari, and Siantar Marimbun (BPS. 2019). The
number of MSMEs in Pematangsiantar City is presented in the picture below:
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
178 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
Based on figure 1 above, it is known as many as 3227 micro-type businesses, 794 types of
small businesses and 59 types of medium-sized businesses. This shows the dominance of
micro-businesses spread across 8 sub-districts is more dominant in number.
MSME Problems in Pematangsiantar City
The existence of MSMEs cannot be denied to have a positive impact on the distribution of
people's income today. In addition to providing opportunities for the community to be
independent in developing their business (Bappeda, 2019). MSMEs are considered able to
increase local wisdom so as to produce and products that are in accordance with the
characteristics of an area. The development of MSMEs is also inseparable from some problems
that are often an obstacle for MSME actors.
Problems that often occur in general include the following.
Capital
The success of MSMEs will be obtained when obtaining information about cash flow from
their businesses, mostly relying on capital from their own finances and assets. This is in line
with the findings of OJK where 70% of the total 60 million MSMEs in Indonesia do not get
access to capital from banking. The lack of financing distribution for MSMEs due to
administrative and financial management constraints that are generally still managed manually
and less guaranteed from entrepreneurs where there is a high risk of creditfailure.
Market Access
Market access is an important thing that is considered in running a business. Businesses
need to get as much information as possible and learn about it, and understand the market. A
business that has broad market access, then the business has a large, wider market share where
it allows it to increase its sales volume. MSMEs in Pematangsiantar market access is still
limited where the majority of products produced are still offered in the local market.
Raw Materials
Pematangsiantar city has cultural, and historical potential. The flagship is a culinary tour
because pematangsianar city as a stopover. There are obstacles faced by culinary industry
businesses regarding raw materials. Such as the increase in the price of raw materials at certain
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
179 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
times such as the eve of the holiday where the price of staples tends to rise. The price increase
increases the sales of the product. And in UMKM weaver ulos where the raw material of
making ulos already where suppiler sells the ulos yarn with credit system and profit sharing
between weaving entrepreneurs and yarn sellers, but suppliers as determinants of the price of
ulos yarn so that it can also threaten the sustainability of this business.
MSME Administration Management
Lack of knowledge about good business management owned by MSMEs in
Pematangsiantar City. Often MSME actors are focused in terms of producing products, but do
not think about the unique, distinctive characteristics, and different from competitors of goods.
This right results in being hampered in the development of the business in the long term. To
be able to understand and carry out aspects of management well, every small, micro, and
medium business actor must understand the functions of management which include: Planning
is the way a business actor determines goals and strategies in achieving them. While the
decision maker designs various methods that must be done to achieve business goals.
Organizing generally in micro and small businesses is still run independently so that in
terms of delegation the work is still impossible to do. Business actors have a dual role because
they do all the work independently. Of course, this is less in terms of effectiveness and
productivity produced low. The third function of management is leadership or direction. A
business actor must be able to guide, motivate, and influence each member to be able to work
according to their respective roles.
The third function of management is control, MSMEs in Pematangsiantar City still do not
do this control process consistently and tend to feel unnecessary. This has an impact on
incomprehension about weaknesses and shortcomings that occur so that it is not possible for
evaluation.
Domestic Market Competitive Pressures
Competition is inevitable in business for both large, medium, and small businesses. This
competition can come from anywhere both within and outside the marketing area.
This happens because of the phenomenon of entrepreneurs who are less focused on the type
of business that is run and impressed "bandwagon effect """ to the types of businesses that are
considered to be trending in the community, such as mobile phone and café businesses that are
mushrooming in Pematangsiantar. The impact of this is the reduced market share owned, so
that many entrepreneurs who lack capital are unable to face the competition that occurs and
forced to go out of business.
MSME Development Strategy in Pematangsiantar City
To advance, improve, and improve MSMEs in Pematangsiantar, development strategies are
needed, among others:
1) On the issue of capital to overcome the difficulties faced by MSMEs related to capital
sources, the government should align the relevant agencies with Akseleran which is
one of the P2P platforms of the Financial Services Authority (OJK), which is able to
provide access to financial inclusion for MSMEs who need funds to maintain and
develop their business. The government should also establish connections with Digital
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
180 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
Companies with blockchain technology that implements business through Digital
Business Indentity and Digital Legder that are able to record transaction data as a
valuable asset, and introduce to pilot businesses that have been considered feasible to
increase their business to the digital level of transformation.
2) MSME entrepreneurs can expand their market access by running online marketing such
as through market place sites. In its application, MSME entrepreneurs must be able to
choose the right online marketing channel so that the results are optimal. This is still
rarely done by MSME entrepreneurs because of their lack of knowledge about how to
utilize e-commerce. Therefore, it is expected that the Government can provide
assistance to MSME entrepreneurs on how to use existing applications and e-commerce
ranging from registration to how to operate it so as to facilitate them in their use. And
the government can support in the form of exhibition or bazaar activities organized by
the Cooperative Office, SMEs and Trade, and so on.
3) The Pematangsiantar City Government interferes in the procurement of ulos raw
materials by forming cooperatives for ulos weaving entrepreneurs, so that each member
can support each other in terms of the provision of raw materials related to business
capital and also establish cooperation with suppliers both locally and outside the region
that can meet the needs of yarn supply for cooperative members. Furthermore, for
culinary raw materials, culinary entrepreneurs should carry out cooperation bonds with
suppliers so that at certain times the price of raw materials can still be the same. The
role of the city government is also very instrumental in the availability of these staples
to maintain the stability of raw material prices in the market.
4) In terms of the management of msme administration, the government provides pingan
to MSME actors through academics from educational institutions in making business
planning through setting business targets, establishing partnerships or building links
both from suppliers, customers, communities, and competitors to optimize their
production activities, conducting training on leadership, implementing control of their
business through the Management Control System (SPM) by choosing People who
have the capacity as speakers.
5) To overcome the domestic competition that occurs, it is expected that the Government
is serious in fostering MSMEs and continues to encourage that MSME actors must
have IUMK (Small Micro Business License) permits, where this IUMK will be legal
or recognition of their business. The government is expected to help the management
of this IUMK to be free and easy through OSS (online single submissions). With the
MSMEs, it will be easier to manage loans. MSME entrepreneurs will have adequate
capital to do business development and create products that are quantity and good
quality so that they are able to compete with other similar entrepreneurs. MSME
entrepreneurs must also innovate products in order to improve their own characteristics,
and differ from competitors. Creativity and initiative make our business / business
superior to competitors. Without it, our business or business will easily fall or make
our profit level smaller.
6) MSME actors think about the resources that can be owned and cannot be imitated by
competitors (Purnomo, Agung, et.al, 2020). Follow the training of improvement on
MSMEs in order to increasingly have knowledge about strategies in developing the
Strategies in Developing MSMEs of Pematangsiantar
181 Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2021
business carried out. As per the results of Apulu and Latham research (2011), there
needs to be an effort to adopt information technology combined with innovation so as
to produce products that have quality so that it has implications for good product
service and becomes its own characteristic. Thinking about the resources that
competitors can have and cannot replicate (Purnomo, Agung, et.al, 2020).
CONCLUSION
In the strategy of MSME development in Pematangsiantar City cannot be separated from
the participation of the government and MSME actors. The government should be able to
provide assistance to MSME actors, as well as socialization and training to MSME actors about
knowledge about aspects of entrepreneurship.
Governments can partner or collaborate with higher education institutions (e.g. colleges) as
an extension to dig up information related to market needs. MSME actors should innovate
products in order to improve their own characteristics, and be different from competitors. In
addition, MSMEs should also open up and join trainings related to how to analyze products
and knowledge about strategies in developing the business carried out.
REFERENCES
Apulu, Idisemi dan Ann Lathan. 2011. Drivers for Information and Communication
Technology Adoption: A Case Study of Nigerian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises.
International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 6, No. 5
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Pematangsiantar. 2019. Jumlah Penduduk Kota Pematangsiantar Per
Kecamatan 2010-2018. Tersedia di: https://siantarkota.bps.go.id/dynamictable
/2015/09/25/2/jumlah-penduduk pematangsiantar-per-kecamatan-2010- 2018.html.
Badan
Pusat Statistik Kota Pematangsiantar. 2019.
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Kota Pematangsiantar. 2019. Penataan UMKM Dalam
Pengembangan Usaha di Kota Pematangsiantar.
Herdhiansyah, Dhian, dkk. 2013. Kriteria Kualitatif Penentuan Produk Unggulan Komoditas
Perkebunan Dengan Metode Delphi di Kabupaten Kolaka Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal
Agritech. Vol. 33, No. 1: 60-69
Kartasasmita, G. 1996. Pembangunan Untuk Rakyat: Memadukan Pertumbuhan dan
Pemerataan. Cides: Jakarta.
Kusdiana, Dikdik dan Ardi Gunardi. 2014. Pengembangan Produk Unggulan UMKM
Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Trikonomika. Vol. 13, No.2: 153-171
Purnomo, Agung, et al., 2020. Dasar-Dasar Kewirausahaan Untuk Perguruan Tinggi dan Dunia
Bisnis. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Singh, et al., 2008. Strategy Development by SMEs for Competitiveness: A Review.
Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 15, No.5: 525-547.
Tambunan, Tulus. 2012. Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah di Indonesia: isu-isu penting.
Jakarta: LP3ES
Undang-Undang nomor 20 tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah