P-ISSN: 2808-5957
E-ISSN: 2808-6724
ijoms.internationaljournallabs.com
2129
JOB CHARACTERISTICS, JOB INVOLVEMENT, AND
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP’S EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE THROUGH WORK ENGAGEMENT
Rizyana Mirda
1
, Prasetyo
2
1
Faculty of Economics, Universitas STIE Mahardika, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Terbuka, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
1
r_mirda@yahoo.com
2
prasetyo8787@gmail.com
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Published: December 25
th
,
2022
The conditions of employee performance in a company is inseparable from
several factors that can influence it. Job characteristic, job involvement, and
leadership are things that can affect employee performance. But they do not
necessarily directly affect an employee's performance, and there can be
factors that bridge them so that employee performance gets better. This
research is to prove and analyze the influence of Job Characteristics, Job
Involvement, Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement and
Performance on Bank Jatim employees, and to prove and analyze the
influence of Work Engagement on Performance on Bank Jatim employees.
The sample population is 365 employees of Bank Jatim. The source of data
in this study collected by survey method. Data analysis techniques used in
research using SEM with Smart PLS software.The results of the analysis can
be concluded that Job Characteristic, Job Involvement, Transformational
Leadership has a significant and positive influence on Work Engagement
and Job Involvement has a significant and positive influence on employee
performance of Bank Jatim employees, but Job Characteristic and
Transformational Leadership has no significant and positive influence on
Employee Performance Bank Jatim employees, while Work Engagement has
a significant and positive influence on employee performance of Bank Jatim
employees.
Keywords: job characteristic, job
involvement, transformational
leadership, work engagement,
performance
This work is licensed under CC
BY-SA 4.0
INTRODUCTION
The condition of the banking world in Indonesia has undergone many changes. Apart from
being caused by internal developments in the banking world, these changes are also inseparable
from the influence of developments outside the banking world, such as the real sector in the
economy, politics, law and society. Banking can experience significant changes if it has qualified
employees.
For companies or organizations if they want to progress, they are required to have qualified
employees. Quality employees are employees whose performance can meet the targets set by the
company. Good employee performance or performance will be directly proportional to good
results in the development of the company's business. On the other hand, poor performance will
also have a negative impact on the company.
Employee performance shows a person's ability to work. An employee is said to have good
performance if he has good quality work in completing every job given by the leader. Good
employee performance is also marked by the ability to complete tasks on time and can achieve
each target set by the company, as stated by Mangkunegara (2013) that employee performance is
the result of work in quality and quantity achieved by an employee in carrying out their duties in
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2130 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
accordance with the responsibilities given. The demand for high employee performance has indeed
become a part of every company, because a successful company cannot be separated from the
performance of the employees who work for that company.
In some conditions the performance of employees in a company is inseparable from several
factors that can influence it. These factors can be in the form of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of
the employee concerned (Mangkuprawira, 2011). Intrinsic factors are more aimed at factors that
come from within the individual itself (education, experience, motivation, health, age, skills,
emotional and spiritual). Extrinsic factors are more aimed at factors that come from outside the
individual consisting of the physical and non-physical environment (leadership, vertical and
horizontal communication, compensation, supervisor control, facilities, training, workload, work
procedures, punishment systems and so on). The implication of the job characteristic model is that
when the strength of growth needs is met from job characteristics, high performance and job
satisfaction will be achieved (Hackman & Oldham, 2005).
Employee engagement is a strong predictor of positive organizational performance. This is
because employees who are emotionally attached to the organization where they work, have high
involvement in work and are enthusiastic about the success of the organization, they are also
willing to do extra things outside of the required work contracts. High involvement in work can be
driven by job characteristics (Markos & Sridevi, 2010).
One of the extrinsic factors that affect employee performance is the characteristics of the job
itself. Job characteristics or job characteristics are defined as attributes of employee duties and
include a number of responsibilities, various tasks, and the extent to which the job has
characteristics that can make employees feel satisfied (Tamalero, Swasto, & Hamid, 2012). Job
Characteristics are inherent in a job, where these Job Characteristics or job characteristics have
aspects or components that can lead to a full understanding of a job, a sense of responsibility for
the results of work, a sense of concern for the impact of work, and also produce positive politeness
norms for employees, to further influence employee engagement (Hackman & Oldham, 2005).
Another factor that intrinsicly influencing employee performance is job involvement.
Involvement in work (Robbins & Judge, 2016) is an attempt to measure the extent to which
individuals consider the work important and the performance achieved as a form of appreciation
for themselves. In other words, job involvement is an employee's commitment to his work. This is
indicated by high employee concern for their work, a feeling of psychological attachment to the
work being done and a strong belief in their ability to complete the job.
Saxena (2015) explains that work involvement is related to individual psychology which is
important for individual image. Work involvement is related to personal characteristics and the
nature of tasks that can enhance social factors such as teamwork, decision-making participation,
how much employees support organizational goals, show achievement and progress in their work
(Bahram, Darre, & Azhdari, 2012). When employees are given the opportunity to contribute
through ideas and suggestions in making a decision, which can increase the performance that
employees are involved in making optimal decisions from various perspectives (Kemelgor, 2010).
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2131 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
The effect of job involvement on employee performance can be observed from the results of
research conducted by Azzahra and Maryati (2016) that job involvement has a significant positive
effect on performance. Research by Gumilang (2017) and Septiadi et al. (2017) also proves that
there is a significant positive effect between work involvement and employee performance.
Apart from Job Characteristics and Job Involvement, another factor that can affect employee
performance is leadership in the company. Transformational leadership, according to (Yukl, 2013),
is leadership that teaches followers to become more aware of the importance and value of work
and persuades employees not to prioritize their own interests for the sake of the organization.
Transformational leadership develops the skills and confidence of employees to be prepared
for more responsibility in an organization. Research by Buil et al. (2019) shows that
transformational leadership influences job performance. Likewise with the research findings of
Pambudi et al. (2016) which proves that transformational leadership has a significant effect on
employee performance, which means that the better the transformational leadership in the
company, the better the employee performance.
In the process, job characteristics, job involvement and transformational leadership do not
necessarily directly affect an employee's performance, but there can be factors that bridge the gap
so that individual performance gets better. One of the mediating factors is generally a factor
originating from within the individual that psychologically influences one's performance, namely
work engagement.
Research conducted by Dewi et al. (2019) proves that Job Characteristics affect Work
Engagement. Likewise, the research by Montori et al. (2019) proves that Job Characteristics have
an effect on Work Engagement. Research by Tindige et al. (2018) proves that Job Involvement
has an effect on Work Engagement. Research conducted by Salu and Hartijasi (2018) and Goei
and Winata (2016) prove that Transformational Leadership influences Work Engagement.
Research by Setjoadi et al. (2016) also proves that Transformational Leadership influences Work
Engagement.
According to Schaufelli and Bakker (2004) Work Engagement is positivity, fulfillment, work
from the center of the mind which is characterized. Work Engagement has implications for the
performance of both individuals and companies. This is in line with Dajani’s research (2015)
which proves that employee engagement has a significant impact on job performance. Work
engagement is important in a company because it can have a positive impact on the company's
success in achieving its goals. (Schiemann, 2011) suggests that attachment has a real positive
impact on the number of desired outcomes; employee retention, performance, quality, customer
satisfaction and loyalty, and financial performance. Research by Fauzi and Sembiring (2016)
shows that employee engagement which consists of vigor and dedication has a significant effect
on the performance of PT Studio Cilaki Empat Lima Bandung employees. Damayanti and
Tjendana (2017), Salu and Hartijasi (2018), and Sulin and Yanuar (2019) also prove that there is
a significant relationship between work engagement and employee performance. The higher the
work engagement of an employee, the higher the employee's performance.
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2132 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
The choice of Bank Jatim as the object of research has several reasons, including the products
offered by Bank Jatim are services. HR is directly related to services, so that in order to maintain
its existence and develop its services, Bank Jatim must continue to improve the performance of its
employees so that the quality of its products and services is guaranteed. However, PT. East Java
Regional Development Bank Tbk (“Bank Jatim”) located in Surabaya, in fact, until now still has
employees with low performance. In reality, the facts on the field show that not all employees in
the company have optimal performance. It was found that there was still performance that had not
reached the target. This is known from the results of initial interviews conducted with the Head of
General Supervisor and HR in the following interview excerpt: “...Here we always evaluate the
performance of employees and we always evaluate these assessments, so that we know the
progress of the performance of the employees here. We usually carry out evaluations every 6
months, and from the results of the evaluation, it was found that there were still employees who
did not meet their targets at work."
There was a decrease in growth in the achievement of funding finance where in 2016 it was
achieved by 0.49% which then decreased in 2017 to 0.06%. Based on the results of initial
observations indicating the low performance of these employees is because employees do not feel
emotionally attached to work (Work Engagement). Employees lack a sense of attachment to work
because they do not understand the characteristics of the work they are responsible for (Job
Characteristic). This can be seen from the results of the initial interviews conducted with the Head
of General Supervisor and HR in the following excerpt of the interview: "...there are employees
who don't feel attached to the company, so sometimes there are employees who don't really want
to try to be better at their job, there are those who want to learn to progress, there are those who
just stagnate, that means they don't feel attached to company."
Another factor that causes Bank Jatim employees to have less attachment to work is the
leadership that is applied in influencing employees at work (transformational leadership). The
existing phenomenon shows that leaders are not fully able to direct employees to understand the
importance of work for employees and have not been able to provide an understanding of
responsibilities at work. This situation can be observed from the lack of integration of employees
in working with the work for which they are responsible, so that they often carry out mutations,
rotations, and demotions, employees feel that their activities are being monitored, they are not
given autonomy at work, so employees feel that work is under pressure, difficulties in developing
their creativity to create value (Value Creation), which in the end has not been able to motivate
employees to be committed to their work.
The effect of job characteristics on work engagement is explained by Hackman and Oldham
(2005), in which Job Characteristics are inherent in a job in influencing employee engagement.
Sulin and Yanuar (2019) proved that Job Characteristics have a significant effect on Work
Engagement. The effect of job characteristics on employee performance is explained by Sulin and
Yanuar (2019) that there is no significant effect between Job Characteristics and employee
performance. The effect of job involvement on employee performance is explained by Septiadi et
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2133 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
al. (2017) that if an organization involves employees more frequently in each job, the employees
involved will be more active and can improve their performance.
The effect of transformational leadership on work engagement is proven in research by
Garvin and Winata (2016) where transformational leadership has a significant influence on work
engagement. Furthermore, Sweetman and Luthans (2010) explain that work engagement is
influenced by work resources that are able to increase employee growth and development. The
effect of transformational leadership on employee performance is explained by Yukl (2013) who
states that transformational leadership makes followers more aware of the importance and value
of work and persuades employees not to prioritize their own interests for the sake of the
organization. The results of Salu and Hartijasi (2018) found that there was no significant effect
between transformational leadership and job performance.
Based on the descriptions above, this study was conducted with the title "The Influence of
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement and
Employee Performance at Bank Jatim". The research would like to measure the effects of job
characteristics, job involvement, and transformational leadership on employee performance
mediated by work engagement.
METHOD
This is an explanatory research, which explains the causal relationship between Job
Characteristics, Job Involvement, Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement and
employee performance at Bank Jatim. This study used a quantitative approach, namely a method
that used a number of samples and numerical data or in the form of numbers (Sugiyono, 2016).
The population used and examined were 365employees with working areas in the Surabaya
Branch and Bank Jatim Sub-Branch. The sampling technique in this study was proportional
sampling. Based on the results of the Slovin formula, a sample of 190.8 was obtained which was
rounded up to 191 samples out of 365. So the samples used in this study were 191 employees of
the Surabaya Branch and Bank Jatim Sub-Branch.
The data collection tool in this study was in the form of a questionnaire. This technique was
carried out by distributing research questionnaires to predetermined samples. This study uses a 5
Likert scale in answering the questions in the research questionnaire. The data analysis technique
used is descriptive analysis, validity and reliability test, and SEM-PLS analysis.
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2134 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Testing of the Inner Structure Model
Figure 1. The Inner Structure Model
The results of the inner weight values in figure above show that Employee Performance is
influenced by Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, Transformational Leadership, and OCB. while
OCB is influenced by Job Characteristic, Job Involvement, Transformational Leadership which is
shown in the following equation.
Y = 0.373 X1 + 0.196 X2 + 0.010 X3 + 0.328 Z
Z = 0.298 X1 + 0.436 X2 + 0.161 X3
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2135 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Hypothesis Test
Table 1. Hypothesis Test
Original
Sample (O)
Sample
Mean (M)
Standard
Deviation
(STDEV)
T Statistics
(|O/STDEV|)
Job Characteristic (X
1
)
-> Work Engagement
(Z)
0.298
0.288
0.107
2.777
Job Characteristic (X
1
)
-> Employee
Performance (Y)
0.373
0.374
0.086
4.324
Job Involvement (X
2
) -
> Work Engagement
(Z)
0.436
0.446
0.109
4.005
Job Involvement (X
2
) -
> Employee
Performance (Y)
0.196
0.205
0.096
2.042
Tranformational
Leadership (X
3
) ->
Work Engagement (Z)
0.161
0.166
0.047
3.418
Tranformational
Leadership (X
3
) ->
Employee Performance
(Y)
0.010
0.009
0.052
0.182
Work Engagement (Z)
-> Employee
Performance (Y)
0.328
0.320
0.081
4.047
The test results show that:
a. Job Characteristics have a significant influence on Work Engagement, because the T
statistic value is 2,777 which means greater than 1.96, so the H1 hypothesis which reads
"Job Characteristics affect Work Engagement in Bank Jatim Employees", can be declared
accepted.
The results of this study are in line with the results of Adiarani's research (2019) in
which job characteristics (autonomy, feedback, skill variation, task identity, and task
significance) have a positive and significant relationship with work involvement. The
higher the job characteristics, the higher the Work Engagement, conversely the lower the
job characteristics, the lower the employee's Work Engagement. Dewi et al. (2019) and
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2136 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
montori et al. (2019) also proves that Job Characteristics have a direct and significant
positive effect on Work Engagement.
b. Job Characteristics have a significant influence on Employee Performance, because the T
statistic value is 4,324 which means greater than 1.96, so the H2 hypothesis which reads
"Job Characteristics affect Employee Performance at Bank Jatim Employees", can be
declared accepted.
The results of this study support the results of research by Affandy (2016), Hamdani
(2015), and Sulin and Yanuar (2019) where job characteristics have a significant positive
effect on employee performance. Ananda and Sunuharyo (2018) also prove that job
characteristics have a significant effect on employee performance.
c. Job Involvement has a significant effect on Work Engagement, because the statistical T
value is 4,005 which means greater than 1.96, so the H3 hypothesis which reads "Job
Involvement has an effect on Work Engagement in Bank Jatim Employees", can be
declared accepted.
The results of this study are in line with the results of Tindige et al. (2018) where
work involvement has a positive effect on employee engagement.
d. Job Involvement has a significant effect on Employee Performance, because the statistical
T-value is 2,042 which means greater than 1.96, so the H4 hypothesis which reads "Job
Involvement affects Employee Performance at Bank Jatim Employees", can be declared
accepted.
The results of this study are in line with the results of research by Damayanti and
Tjendana (2017), and Riza et al. (2017) which show that there is a significant positive
relationship between the variables of Work Engagement and Performance. Gumilang
(2017), Dajani (2015), and Septiadi et al. (2017) in their research also proves that work
involvement has a significant effect on employee performance.
e. Transformational Leadership has a significant influence on OCB, because the T statistic
value is 3,418 which means greater than 1.96, so the H5 hypothesis which reads
"Transformational Leadership affects Work Engagement in Bank Jatim Employees", can
be declared accepted.
The results of this study are not in line with the results of research by (Raharjo &
Witiastuti, 2016) where transformational leadership has no effect on work engagement.
However, Handayani (2017) proves that transformational leadership for individualized
concerns has a significant effect on employee engagement.
f. Transformational Leadership does not have a significant effect on Employee Performance,
because the T
statistic
value is 0.182 which means it is smaller than 1.96, so the H6 hypothesis
which reads "Transformational Leadership affects Employee Performance at Bank Jatim
Employees", can be declared not accepted.
The results of this study are in line with the results of the research by Setjoadi et al.
(2016) where transformational leadership has a direct, insignificant positive effect on
employee performance. However, the results of this study differ from those of Buil,
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2137 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Martinez, and Matute (2019), Pambudi et al. (2016) where transformational leadership has
a significant contribution to employee performance. Tucunan et al. (2014) also concluded
that there is a positive and significant influence between transformational leadership and
employee performance.
g. Work Engagement has a significant effect on Employee Performance, because the T
statistic value is 4,047 which means greater than 1.96, so the H7 hypothesis which reads
"Work Engagement has an effect on Employee Performance at Bank Jatim Employees",
can be declared accepted.
The results of this study are in line with the results of Fauzi and Sembiring's
research (2016) where employee engagement has a significant effect on employee
performance at PT Studio Cilaki Empat Lima Bandung.
CONCLUSION
This study applies the theory of leadership, Job Characteristics, and job involvement to work
engagement and employee performance at Bank Jatim employees. The results of the study show
that there is an influence of leadership, job characteristics, and job involvement on work
engagement. Leaders must be able to carry out various supervisions to increase employee work
engagement. These results reinforce the theory that work engagement is influenced by work
resources that can increase employee growth and development. The results of this study also have
implications for the development of management science, especially human resource management,
where leadership, job characteristics, and job involvement are important in increasing work
engagement.
For Bank Jatim, this research can be a consideration for policy makers in the company to be
able to improve the performance of its employees. The results of the study show that employee
performance is influenced by Job Involvement. Companies must strive to continuously improve
the Job Involvement of their employees.
This research can later be used as a reference for further research in conducting similar or
similar research and can even be used as further research specifically related to concepts or theories
that support human resource management knowledge, namely regarding transformational
leadership, job characteristics, job involvement, work engagement, and performance.
REFERENCES
Adiarani, P. G. (2019). The effects of job characteristics on work engagement. RJOAS, 475-479.
Affandy, R. E. (2016). Pengaruh karakteristik pekerjaan terhadap kinerja pegawai dengan motivasi
dan lingkungan kerja sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Ekonomika-Bisnis, 77-86.
Ananda, S., & Sunuharyo, B. S. (2018). Pengaruh karakteristik individu dan karakteristik
pekerjaan terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan variabel mediator motivasi kerja karyawan
(Studi pada Karyawan PT. Petrokimia Gresik). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis.
Azzahra, F., & Maryati, T. (2016). Dampak job involvement dalam peningkatan kinerja pegawai
melalui komitmen organisasional. JBTI.
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2138 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Bahram, A. M., Darre, I., & Azhdari, G. (2012). The relationship between job involvement,
responsibility, and emotional analysis with job satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and
Psychotherapy.
Buil, I., Martinez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee
performance: the role of indentification, engagement, and proactive personality.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 64-75.
Dajani, M. Z. (2015). The impact of employee engagement on job performance and organizational
commitment in the Egyptian banking sector. Journal of Business and Management
Sciences, 138-147.
Damayanti, N., & Tjendana, M. (2017). Hubungan motivasi kerja dan keterlibatan kerja dengan
kinerja. Jurnal Analitika, 1-7.
Dewi, N. K., Hermawan, A., & Affandi, M. J. (2019). Pengaruh job characteristic dan leader
member exchange (LMX) terhadap work engagement di PT. Elang Perdana Tyre Industry.
Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 430-440.
Fauzi, O. F., & Sembiring, J. (2016). Pengaruh employee engagement terhadap kinerja pegawai di
PT. Studio Cilaki Empat Lima Bandung. E-Proceeding of Management, 3080-3087.
Garvin, & Winata, W. B. (2016). Peran gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan transaksional
terhadap keterikatan kerja (Studi pada karyawan Universitas X). Psibernetika.
Goei, G., & Winata, W. B. (2016). Peran gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan transaksional
terhadap keterikatan kerja (Studi pada pegawai Universitas X). Psibernetika, 37-53.
Gumilang, G. G. (2017). Kualitas kehidupan kerja dan keterlibatan kerja terhadap kinerja
pegawai pada PT. Nusantara Jaya Sentosa cabang Setiabudi Bandung. Universitas
Komputer Indonesia.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (2005). Work redesign. Addisen Wesley Publishing Company,
Inc.
Hamdani, D. (2015). Pengaruh karakteristik pekerjaan, pemberdayaan dan motivasi terhadap
kinerja operator SD Negeri di Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Educational Management.
Handayani, N. P. (2017). Pengaruh Transformasional leadership terhadap employee engagement
telaah pada organisasi non-profit area Pulau Jawa, Sumatra, Sulawesi, dan Bali. Ultima
Management, 39-54.
Kemelgor, B. H. (2010). A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between
selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. Journal Entrepreneurship and Regional
Development.
Mangkunegara, A. A. (2013). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Mangkuprawira, S. (2011). Manajemen sumber daya manusia stratejik. Ghalia Indonesia.
Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Key to improving performance. International Journal of
Business and Management.
Montori, M., Adolfina, & Dotulong, L. O. (2019). Pengaruh dukungan organisasi, karakteristik
pekerjaan, dan pengembangan karir terhadap keterikatan karyawan pada PT. Pegadaian
(PERSERO) bagian Deputi Bisnis Area Manado. Jurnal EMBA.
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2139 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Pambudi, D. S., Mukzam, D., & Nurtjahjono, G. E. (2016). Pengaruh gaya transformational
leadership terhadap kinerja karyawan melalui kepuasan kerja karyawan sebagai variabel
mediasi (Studi pada karyawan PT. Telkom Indonesia Witel Jatim Selatan Malang). Jurnal
Administrasi Bisnis, 164-171.
Raharjo, D. C., & Witiastuti, R. S. (2016). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap
keterikatan kerja melalui keadilan organisasional sebagai variabel mediasi. Management
Analysis Journal.
Riza, F. A., Prohimi, A. H., & Juariyah, L. (2017). Pengaruh kompensasi dan keterlibatan kerja
terhadap kinerja karyawan. Ekonomi Bisnis , 58-66.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Perilaku organisasi. Salemba Empat.
Salu, O., & Hartijasi, Y. (2018). Analisis pengaruh work engagement sebagai mediator antara job
resources dan kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap organizational commitment dan
job I di lembaga pendidikan Amerika. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Informatika, 171-
192.
Saxena, S. (2015). Impact of job involvement and organizational commitment on organizational
citizanship behaviour. International Journal Management Business.
Schaufelli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with
burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 293-
315.
Schiemann, W. A. (2011). Alignment capability engagement. PPM.
Septiadi, S. A., Sintaasih, D. K., & Wibawa, I. M. (2017). Pengaruh keterlibatan kerja terhadap
kinerja dengan pemediasi komitmen organisasional. E-Journal dan Bisnis Universitas
Udayana, 3103-3132.
Setjoadi, T. N., Christianti, L., & Widjaja, D. C. (2016). Pengaruh transformasional leadership
melalui employee engagement sebagai variabel intervening terhadap kinerja karyawan
Restoran Steak Hut Surabaya. Jurnal Hospitality dan Manajemen Jasa Universitas Kristen
Petra, 209-222.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulin, & Yanuar. (2019). Efek mediasi work engagement dalam pengaruh job characteristic dan
percieved organizational support terhadap employee performance di bidang IT pada
perusahaan startup. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan.
Sweetman, D., & Luthans, F. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and
work engagement. In Work Engagement: A Handbook of essential theory and research (p.
54). New York: Psychological Press.
Tamalero, Y., Swasto, B., & Hamid, D. (2012). Pengaruh karakteristik pekerjaan dan kepuasan
kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi dan intention to quit (Studi pada pegawai PT. Manado
Media Grafika). Jurnal Profit.
Tindige, P. F., Sepang, J. L., & Roring, F. (2018). Analisis pengaruh persepsi dukungan organisasi
dan keterlibatan kerja terhadap keterikatan karyawan di PT. Wahana Nismo Manado.
Jurnal EMBA.
Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Transformational Leadership’s Effects on Employee
Performance through Work Engagement
2140 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 3 ) , Dec,
2022
Tucunan, R. J., Supartha, W. G., & Riana, I. G. (2014). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional
terhadap motivasi dan kinerja karyawan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas
Udayana, 533-550.
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.