Analysis of the Relationship Between Climate Change Impacts and Terrorism in ASEAN (1990-2018)
2385 | I n d o n e s i a n J o u r n a l o f M u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y S c i e n c e , 2 ( 4 ) , Jan,
2023
caused by scarcity of resources and infrastructure (The Expert Group of the International Military
Council on Climate and Security, 2020). The United States of America, under the leadership of
Joe Biden, has reverted to the notion that the biggest threat to the United States is climate change.
This is reflected in statements from the leadership of the United States, including the President's
speech at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on July 27, 2021 (The White House,
2021).
The US Global Leadership Coalition (2021) in its climate change fact sheet has shown that
the developing world is receiving the brunt of the climate crisis. For these countries, the climate
change is acting as ββthreat multipliersβ and catalysts for conflictβ. This phenomenon, coupled with
the fact that developing nations mostly rely on agriculture, a sector heavily vulnerable to changes
in climate, has pushed millions of people into poverty on a yearly basis.
The Southeast Asian region itself, unfortunately, is not a stranger to the threat of terrorism.
Sandhiyudha (2016) noted that Southeast Asia as a region has become a theatre on the global war
on terror with terrorism conducted by insurgent groups as well as off-shoots of known international
terrorist groups and movements. Since 1970 to 2020, the Global Terrorism Database (National
Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), n.d.) has identified
14,498 terrorism incidents throughout Southeast Asia. The three prominent types of attack in these
incidents are bombing and explosion (35.6%), armed assault (33.6%), and assassination (11.9%).
This paper intends to review the link between climate change and terrorism in member
countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Association of Southeast Asian
Nations/ASEAN).
Asaka (2021) in his initial review said that there are two academic thoughts in discussing
whether there is a link between terrorism and climate change, namely: climate change exacerbates
existing conditions of social vulnerability thereby encouraging acts of terrorism (Price & Elu,
2017); or climate change drives terrorism and vice versa through complex circular relationships
(Baird, 2006). Silke & Morrison (2022) asserted that there is a gradual shift in the role played by
climate change in terrorism-related conflicts. The UK government even has put environmental
organisations such as Greenpeace, Sea Shepherd, and Extinction Rebellion along the likes of
Combat 18, Al Qaeda, and Islamic State in the terrorism prevention literatures (Dodd & Grierson,
2020).
Gerstl & Helmke (2011) noted that ASEAN has had a shift in views regarding the issue of
climate change, although it is still heavily influenced by issues of economic growth and interests
between countries. This view is also in line with the results of Islam and Keieu's research (2020)
that regional groups, including ASEAN, experience obstacles in implementing climate change
policies due to the priority of national development issues from each member country. Subiyanto
et al. (2018) found that climate change tends to disrupt or threaten the livelihood of the people,
thus it warrants closer examination as it may relate to security issues in many levels.
There are differences in climate change indicators used by institutions in Indonesia, or by
foreign agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or the World
Bank. Indonesia, as stated in the National Action Plan for Climate Change using indicators of sea