Strategy to improve supplier performance for product competitiveness in the fried onion supply chain in Kuningan Regency

Authors

  • Rina Rismayanti Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Namira Reski Audriana S. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Yayat Rahmat Hidayat Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i12.1005

Keywords:

commitment, trust, information sharing, supplier performance, competitiveness

Abstract

This study aims to determine strategies that have proven to be effective in improving supplier performance. This study uses SmartPLS SEM (Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modeling) software for analysis. The results show that the variables of commitment, trust, information sharing, and supplier performance affect competitiveness by 0.294 (29.4%), 0.133 (13.3%), 0.587 (58.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, commitment, trusted, and information sharing affect supplier performance by 0.359 (35.9%), 0.055 (05.5%), 0.599 (59.9%) and 0.417 (41.7%), respectively. Moreover, the variable of information sharing has a significant effect on supplier performance (P0.05). This study provides valuable insights and practical recommendations for organizations looking to improve their supply chain management and strengthen supplier relationships, contributing to the broader understanding of performance optimization in supplier networks. In addition, it is also useful as a reference for fried onion suppliers in order to improve performance.

References

Abdallah, A. B., Alfar, N. A., & Alhyari, S. (2021). The effect of supply chain quality management on supply chain performance: the indirect roles of supply chain agility and innovation. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 51(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2020-0011

Alshurideh, M. T., Al Kurdi, B., Alzoubi, H. M., Obeidat, B., Hamadneh, S., & Ahmad, A. (2022). The influence of supply chain partners’ integrations on organizational performance: The moderating role of trust. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.8.009

Chih-Yi, S., & Bou-Wen, L. (2021). Attack and defense in patent-based competition: A new paradigm of strategic decision-making in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120670

Connor, N. O., Lowry, P. B., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Interorganizational cooperation and supplier performance in high-technology supply chains. Heliyon, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03434

Deghedi, G. A. (2014). Information Sharing as a Collaboration Mechanism in Supply Chains. Information and Knowledge Mangement, 4(4).

Faruquee, M., Paulraj, A., & Irawan, C. A. (2021). Strategic supplier relationships and supply chain resilience: Is digital transformation that precludes trust beneficial? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2020-0702

Felipe, C. M., Leidner, D. E., Roldán, J. L., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2020). Impact of IS Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Roles of Organizational Agility and Industry Technology Intensity. Decision Sciences, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12379

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003

Hastig, G. M., & Sodhi, M. M. S. (2020). Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors. Production and Operations Management, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13147

Herrera, J., & De Las Heras-Rosas, C. (2021). The Organizational Commitment in the Company and Its Relationship With the Psychological Contract. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609211

Juniarto, T., Surya Negara, P. P., & Wahyudi, B. (2021). Pengaruh Kinerja Pemasok Terhadap Kinerja Rantai Pasok Menggunakan Metode Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) pada PT. Tiga Serangkai. Integrasi?: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.32502/js.v6i1.3792

Kmieciak, R. (2020). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Morais, G. M., Santos, V. F. dos, Tolentino, R. D. S. da S., & Martins, H. C. (2021). Intrapreneurship, Innovation, and Competitiveness in Organization. International Journal of Business Administration, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v12n2p1

Morgan, T. R., Gabler, C. B., & Manhart, P. S. (2023). Supply chain transparency: theoretical perspectives for future research. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0115

Mukhsin, Moh. (2017). PENGARUH KEPERCAYAAN DAN KOMITMEN TERHADAP KUALITAS HUBUNGAN DAMPAKNYA PADA KINERJA RANTAI PASOKAN (Studi Kasus Produksi dan Distribusi Dedak pada PD Sederhana). Jurnal Manajemen, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v21i3.262

Munizu, M. (2017). PENGARUH KEPERCAYAAN, KOMITMEN, DAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI TERHADAP KINERJA RANTAI PASOKAN (STUDI KASUS IKM PENGOLAH BUAH MARKISA DI KOTA MAKASSAR). Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.14.1.32

Peña, J. A. D., Bas, Á. O., & Maldonado, N. M. R. (2021). Impact of bullwhip effect in quality and waste in perishable supply chain. Processes, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071232

Sarkar, B., Sarkar, M., Ganguly, B., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2021). Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107867

Sharma, M., & Joshi, S. (2023). Digital supplier selection reinforcing supply chain quality management systems to enhance firm’s performance. TQM Journal, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2020-0160

Širá, E., Vavrek, R., Vozárová, I. K., & Kotuli?, R. (2020). Knowledge economy indicators and their impact on the sustainable competitiveness of the EU countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104172

Stewart, T., & Alrutz, M. (2012). Meaningful Relationships: Cruxes of University-Community Partnerships for Sustainable and Happy Engagement. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.54656/nyhz8317

Tajvidi, M., Wang, Y., Hajli, N., & Love, P. E. D. (2021). Brand value Co-creation in social commerce: The role of interactivity, social support, and relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.006

Vieira, V. A., Mayberry, R., Boles, J., Johnson-Busbin, J., & Pereira, R. C. (2023). The mediating role of cooperative norms in the formation of buyer commitment in the buyer–seller relationship. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 38(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2021-0044

Wan, P. K., Huang, L., & Holtskog, H. (2020). Blockchain-Enabled Information Sharing within a Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980142

Yadav, S., & Singh, S. P. (2020). Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104505

Yang, Y., Lin, J., Liu, G., & Zhou, L. (2021). The behavioural causes of bullwhip effect in supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108120

Zaman, S. I., Khan, S. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2024). Investigating the relationship between supply chain finance and supply chain collaborative factors. Benchmarking, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2022-0295

Downloads

Published

2024-09-23