PROBLEMS OF THE SETTLEMENT OF STATE LOOTED GOODS IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF CORRUPTION AND MONEY LAUNDERING AT PT ASURANSI JIWASRAYA

Authors

  • Yully Lestari Tasdikin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Slamet Tri Wahyudi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v1i10.186

Keywords:

Legal Certainty, Zakat, State Administrative Law.

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal law system has not been optimal in making the recovery of assets resulting from crimes that are not the target/focus of criminal law material because the current criminal law related to the recovery of assets resulting from crimes is only symbolic in its implementation so that the consequences for the interests of recovering the impact of crimes are regulated indirectly. and is abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine, analyze and describe the application of the authority of the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) in the settlement of state confiscations in the corruption and money laundering cases of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero). This thesis research is included in the type of normative juridical research. Normative juridical research is research in which the law is conceptualized as what is written in the legislation (law in books) or the law is conceptualized as a rule or norm which is a benchmark for human behavior that is considered appropriate. The results of the Asset Recovery Center can receive and carry out asset recovery requests from other Ministries/Agencies with the approval of the Attorney General. Therefore, the Asset Recovery Center supports the execution of state booty in the corruption and money laundering cases of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero).

References

REFERENCE

Amiruddin & Asikin, Z. (2004). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Djufri, Darmadi, Kesuma, Derry Angling, & Afriani, Kinaria. (2020). Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Disiplin: Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda, 120–132.

Hakim, Abdul. (2020). Alternatif Metode Ganti Kerugian terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana sebagai Wujud Restorative Justice dalam Perspektif RKUHAP. Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia Teropong, 8(7), 16–17.

Jerman, Heri. (2017). Pemulihan Aset Hasil Kejahatan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Jurnal DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(25), 150.

Nasional, Pusat Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum. (2012). Laporan Akhir Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perampasan Aset Pidana. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN), Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Sukarno. (2018). Penerapan Perampasan Aset di Indonesia sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Kerugian Negara dalam Perspektif Keuangan Negara. Indonesian Treasury Review, 3(4), 297.

Syamsudin, M. (2012). Keadilan Substantif yang terabaikan dalam Sengketa Sita Jaminan. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(1), 36–50.

Yanuar, Purwaning M. (2007). Pengembalian aset hasil korupsi: berdasarkan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi, 2003 dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Alumni.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-13