VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SATISFACTION MEASUREMENT SCALE ON PEDESTRIAN PATHS IN KENDARI CITY
Keywords:feasibility analysis; pedestrian path; RTH.
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the importance and satisfaction scale of pedestrian paths in the green open space area of ??Kendari City and to find out which indicators have the greatest contribution to each research variable. The indicators used in this study include: accessibility, connectivity, circulation, security, safety, noise, beauty, climate and cleanliness to determine the priority of services needed to improve the performance of pedestrian path facilities. This study uses 27 research variables which are a combination of quantitative and qualitative research, with a sample of 399 respondents on the pedestrian path users of Green Open Space (RTH). Data retrieval was carried out using a scale of importance and a satisfaction scale that was compiled with a Likert Scale model. The data were analyzed using the SPSS Version 26 method. The validity test aims to assess the extent to which the measuring instrument is believed to be used as a tool to measure the research questions. Test the validity by comparing the values ??of rcount and rtable. If the value of rcount > rtable, then the item is declared valid, and vice versa. It is known that n = 30 5% significance then the value of rtable = 0.361.iate between departments in the same organization). The variables of accessibility, connectivity, circulation, security, comfort, safety, beauty, climate/shade and cleanliness show that the Pearson Correlation value for each question item for the 9 variable instrument is greater than rtable = 0.361. In addition, the overall significance value is smaller than 0.05. So that the question indicator of all 9 variable instruments has a valid construct. Reliability test was conducted to measure the level of consistency of a measuring instrument used at different times. The test was carried out using the Alpha method from Cronbach. The instrument is declared reliable if the calculation results show the Cronbach Alpha value > 0.6. The results showed that the Cronbach Alpha value of each instrument variable in the study had a value > 0.60, thus it can be stated that the instrument's accessibility, connectivity, circulation, security, safety, noise, beauty, climate/safety and cleanliness are reliable.
Anguluri, R., & Narayanan, P. (2017). Role of green space in urban planning: Outlook towards smart cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 58–65.
Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, B., Zaunbrecher, B. S., Paas, B., Ottermanns, R., Ziefle, M., & Roß-Nickoll, M. (2018). Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 1364–1378.
Dietrich, U., & Kengyel, N. (2016). What makes a public open space liveable? WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 204, 685–696.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life (Vol. 2). Springer.
Hakim, R. (1987). Unsur Perancangan Dalam Arsitektur Lansekap, Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.
Hantono, D. (2019). Kajian Perilaku Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik. NALARs, 18(1), 45–56.
Hartono, D. A. (2018). Arahan Livabilitas Ruang Terbuka Publik di Kawasan Normalisasi Banjir Kanal Barat, Semarang. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Heylen, K. (2006). Liveability in social housing: three case studies in Flanders. ENHR Conference’Housing in an Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Implementation and Participation’, Date: 2006/07/02-2006/07/05, Location: Ljubljana (Slovenia).
Holt-Jensen, A. (2001). Individual relational space in deprived urban neighbourhoods. ENHR Conference, 25, 29.
Omar, D., Ahmad, P., & Sarimin, M. (2005). Urbanisation and the well being of female headed households in Malaysia: The case study of lower income single mothers in urban centres.
Copyright (c) 2022 Nahdatunnisa, Wahyudi Wahyudi, Henny Adi, M. Arzal Tahir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.