Fulfillment of the Right to Disclosure Information in Realizing Good Governance

Authors

  • Mahdy Muhana Azis Department of Citizenship Education, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, East Java
  • Rini Triastuti Department of Citizenship Education, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, East Java
  • Dewi Gunawati Department of Citizenship Education, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, East Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i3.315

Keywords:

good governance, rights fulfillment, information disclosure

Abstract

This study would like to reveal the implementation and strategies used by public officials in the policy process related to dam construction in Lampung Province. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive analysis approach. Within the scope of Lampung Province, the policy of the Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR) through the Balai Besar Wilayah Mesuji-Sekampung (BBWS) is to complete the construction of the Margatiga Dam, one of its duties is to ensure the implementation of public and legal communications as well as complaints from the local community. The study results indicate that information disclosure has been seen in planning and performance transparency. This is evidenced by the involvement of the community through indigenous community forums, community coordination with implementing public relations, and holding socialization for each village.

References

Abdulai, E. S. (2022). Comparative analysis of freedom of information laws in Sierra Leone and Liberia. In Freedom of Information Law and Good Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83658-0_4

Addink, G. H. (2018). Good governance: Importance in practice, theories and definitions. Halu Oleo Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v1i1.2347

BPS Provinsi Lampung. (2022). Persentase penduduk miskin Provinsi Lampung. BPS Provinsi Lampung.

Dhillon, G., & Torkzadeh, G. (2006). Value-focused assessment of information system security in organizations. Information Systems Journal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00219.x

Flyverbom, M. (2016). Digital age transparency: Mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication, 10, 13.

Gao, X., & Yu, J. (2020). Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1744922

Jatmiko, B., & Lestiawan, H. Y. (2016). Good governance government andthe effect on local governmentperformance (Survey on gunung kidul district government of Indonesia). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14(14).

Kelly, S. (2015). Estimating economic loss from cascading infrastructure failure: a perspective on modelling interdependency. Infrastructure Complexity, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0010-y

Krina, L. L. (2003). Indikator dan alat ukur prinsip akuntabilitas, transparansi dan partisipasi. Sekretariat Good Public Governance Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Moonti, R. M. (2019). Regional autonomy in realizing good governance. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i1.31

Novita, D., Malela, M., Susila, A., Fadhil, M., Suryani, E., & Yunus, M. (2022). Implementation of good governance principles in the public information disclosure policy. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.15-9-2021.2315580

Nugroho, R. (2011). Public private partnership as a policy dilemma. International Journal of Administrative Science and Organization, 18(3).

Srinivasu, B., Professor, A., & Srinivasa Rao, P. (2013). Infrastructure development and economic growth: Prospects and perspective. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(1).

Wijaya, Pujiarti, E. S., & Aristuning. (2019). Regulatory development of good governance on national fish logistics. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(1).

Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x

Wright, M., Siegel, D. S., Keasey, K., & Filatotchev, I. (2013). The Oxford handbook of corporate governance (Vol. 28). Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mahdy Muhana Azis, Rini Triastuti, Dewi Gunawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.