Evaluating the Social Responsibility Program by PT. Petrokimia Gresik

Authors

  • Titiek Irewati Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universitas Gunadarma, Depok, West Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i4.424

Keywords:

social performance, partnership programs, Petrokimia Gresik

Abstract

State-owned companies have an obligation to carry out Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities in a unified and sustainable manner, not only in the form of temporary events that are charitable in nature. Qualitative research with case study method were used to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the Social Responsibility program by PT. Petrokimia Gresik. Based on the tracing of documents and survey facts, it is known that the implementation of CSR by companies with a direction to advance food security so that it has a heavy point in the agricultural sector at large. The principle of partnership funds with a system of groups and cooperatives while Community Development for village villages that are in the ring one with the company directs to the field of education and skills. The response of fostered partners and followers of educational programs is relatively good because it fosters opportunities to make efforts, the ability of partners to develop technologies, systems and products. Corporate Social Performance has a positive relationship with Corporate Finance Performance with the many recognitions and awards received by PT. Petrokimia Gresik.

References

Abukosim, Mukhtaruddin, Ferina, I. S., & Nurcahaya, C. (2014). Ownership structure and firm values: Empirical study on Indonesia manufacturing listed companies. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, V(4).

Ahmed, J. U., Islam, Q. T., Ahmed, A., Faroque, A. R., & Uddin, M. J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in the wake of COVID-19: multiple cases of social responsibility as an organizational value. Society and Business Review, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2020-0113

Ambadar, J. (2008). CSR dalam praktik di Indonesia: Wujud kepedulian dunia usaha. Elexmedia Komputindo.

Arato, M., Speelman, S., & van Huylenbroeck, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility applied for rural development: An Empirical Analysis of Firms from the American Continent. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010102

Argianzah, N. A. (2019). Implementasi dan dampak corporate social responsibility (CSR) dalam Program Kampung Rosella berbasis One Village One Product (OVOP) PT Petrokimia Gresik [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universitas Brawijaya.

Audretsch, D. B., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2022). Emerging needs of social innovators and social innovation ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00789-9

Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3

Cui, Z., Liang, X., & Lu, X. (2015). Prize or price? Corporate social responsibility commitment and sales performance in the Chinese private sector. Management and Organization Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12033

Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup. (2012). Pedoman CSR untuk bidang lingkungan hidup. Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup.

Kusuma, A. A., & Aryani, Y. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility dan kinerja perusahaan (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listing di BEI tahun 2016-2017). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jab.v20i1.406

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3

Mutti, D., Yakovleva, N., Vazquez-Brust, D., & di Marco, M. H. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resources Policy, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.001

Ningtyas, R. P. (2011). Implementasi corporate social responsibility BUMN dalam bentuk sistem kemitraan antara PT. Petrokimia Gresik dengan petani padi Desa Pinggir, Balongpanggang, Gresik [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universitas Brawijaya.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

PT Petrokimia Gresik. (2021). Laporan tahunan Petrokimia Gresik 2021.

Rachman, N. M., Efendi, A., & Wicaksana, E. (2012). Pedoman lengkap perencanaan CSR. Penerbit Swadaya.

Roza, S. (2014). Perencanaan implementasi dan evaluasi program CSR (Corporate Social Responcibility). Ekonomi, 3(1).

Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization and Environment, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722882

Shidiq, A. F., Purnama, F. H., Raharjo, S. T., & Humaedi, S. (2020). Strategi tanggung jawab sosial Starbuck dalam mewujudkan lingkungan yang berkelanjutan. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v6i3.26207

Shinohara, Y. (2014). A study on CSP and CFP relationships: When does CSP effect on CFP and Which Stakeholder Is the Most Influential on CFP. Mita Business Review, 57(2).

Wibisono, M., Darmadji, S. H., & Sutanto, A. C. (2014). Hubungan antara corporate social performance (CSP) dan corporate financial performance (CFP) pada sektor pertambangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2012. Prosiding Penelitian Sivitas Akademika Unisba (Sosial Dan Humaniora), 3(1).

Widodo, E., Sukoharsono, E. G., Hidayat, K., & Djati, M. S. (2017). Phenomenology study of corporate social responsibility: Perspective of PT. Petrokimia Gresik management. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies, 20(4).

Yang, F.-J., & Lin, C.-W. (2010). The linkage between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. Business, 4(April).

Downloads

Published

2023-01-30