Mixing of Brand Cancellation Lawsuits and Brand Infringement Lawsuits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i4.425Keywords:
brand, curcuma lawsuit, cancellation, violationAbstract
The mixing between trademark infringement lawsuits and annulments has made it an issue in trademark law enforcement, thus making it an excuse for the Supreme Court to overturn the Court's ruling. It raises new cases from the procedural law of brand law enforcement, but the dimensions of brand protection must still be upheld. For this reason, it is necessary to explain the difference between a trademark infringement lawsuit and trademark cancellation, as well as the reasons for the supreme court judge in decision No.525K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020 annulling judgment No. 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN Niaga.Sby regarding the mixing between the trademark infringement lawsuit and the cancellation of the brand. The Panel of Judges of the Surabaya District Court in Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN-Niaga.Sby seems to prioritize its establishment based on the perspective of legal expediency, thus categorizing the defendant's actions as trademark violations. The Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court prioritizes its establishment based on the perspective of order, so the reason for overturning the decision of the Surabaya District Court considering the mixing between the infringement lawsuit and the cancellation of the brand is based on legal certainty. It is necessary to discuss the pattern of application of the law that converges between trademark cancellation lawsuits and trademark infringement and advise the Supreme Court to make guidelines in the form of regulations aimed at the judiciary that contain provisions on the criteria between annulment lawsuits and trademark infringement, so that they can be a reference for judges in the proceedings.
References
Aryani, E. (2011). Pelanggaran hak atas merek dan mekanisme penyelesaiannya di Indonesia. Wacana Hukum, 10(1).
Aryanto, H. (2018, November 21). Beracara di pengadilan niaga dalam perkara gugatan merek. SNH Law Office.
Dewi, N. M. T. (2021). Perlindungan hukum hak merek dalam persaingan pasar bebas di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(2).
Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media.
Hadjon, P. M. (1997). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Isman. (2021). Kumulasi gugatan antara perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(1).
Kurnia, A. J. (2019). Proses pendaftaran merek dan gugatan pembatalannya. HukumOnline.com.
Laela, F. I. (2020). Analisis kepastian hukum merek terkenal terdaftar terhadap sengketa gugatan pembatalan merek. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2).
Lasut, P. W. (2019). Penyelesaian sengketa gugatan atas pelanggaran merek menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2016 tentang merek dan indikasi geografis. Lex Et Societatis, 7(1).
Purwaka, T. H. (2017). Perlindungan merek. Pustaka Obor.
Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Alumni.
Safitri, P. A., & Astariyani, N. L. G. (2019). Pembatalan merek oleh pihak yang tidak berhak: Kajian itikad baik. Kertha Wicara, 8.
Santoso, E. (2016). Penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran merek dagang melalui peran kepabeanan sebagai upaya menjaga keamanan dan kedaulatan negara. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 5(1).
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian hukum normatif. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suardi, A., & Candra, M. (2016). Politik hukum perspektif hukum perdata dan pidana Islam serta ekonomi syariah. Prenada Media.
Swantoro, H., Fakhriah, E. L., & Ikhwansyah, I. (2017). Permohonan upaya hukum peninjauan kembali kedua kali berbasis keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 29(2).
Tobing, C. N. M. (2018). Menggagas pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam bingkai ius constituendum sebagai upaya perwujudan kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yosi Esa Hadi Saputra, Henny Marlyna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
