Risk Analysis of Joint Operation Implementation on Large Dam Projects (Case Study: Tapin Dam)

Authors

  • Septian Rizki Pramono Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya, East Java
  • Tri Joko Wahyu Adi Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya, East Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i5.430

Keywords:

joint operation, risk, Tapin Dam, mitigation

Abstract

Along with the implementation of project work with the Joint Operation (KSO) system, there are risks that arise due to differences in vision between partners so that risks that may occur need to be identified so that risk mitigation can be carried out. This study aims to identify the risks that arise in the KSO project in Tapin Dam, South Kalimantan. KSO risk identification begins with conducting a literature study to create a risk list and then conducting a preliminary survey and expert validation to determine the relevance of KSO risk to the project that is the object of research. Furthermore, the Probability Impact Matrix (PIM) is used to see the dominant risks that affect the achievement of project goals. This study also analyzes the risk allocation of each party and proposes mitigation actions. Based on the results of the study, it was found that among 30 relevant risk variables, 11 variables identified as high risk which are then allocated and determined its risk mitigation.

References

Abednego, M. P., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2006). Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.010

Al-Hammad, A.-M. (2000). Common interface problems among various construction parties. Jurnal Performance Construction Facilities, 14, 71–74.

Artto, K., Ahola, T., & Vartiainen, V. (2016). From the front end of projects to the back end of operations: Managing projects for value creation throughout the system lifecycle. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.003

Faraji, A., Rashidi, M., & Perera, S. (2021). Text mining risk assessment–based model to conduct uncertainty analysis of the general conditions of contract in housing construction projects: Case study of the NSW GC21. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000489

Kembuan, A. S., Mandagi, R. J. M., & Lumeno, S. S. (2019). Model risiko pengelolaan SDM konstruksi dalam international joint operation pada proyek infrastruktur jalan tol Manado-Bitung. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 7(1), 113–126.

Kusumadewi, A., Listyani, V., & Risiko, A. (2017). Analisa manajemen risiko tahap konstruksi pada proyek kereta cepat Jakarta-Bandung. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 157–164.

Lumeno, S. S. (2011). Masalah budaya dalam proyek international joint venture. Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering, 1(2), 144–150.

Marzuki, P. F., & Lumeno, S. S. (2011). Persepsi risiko terhadap penyediaan dan pengelolaan tenaga kerja dalam international joint venture pada proyek infrastruktur. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2011.18.1.2

Osipova, E., & Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007

Ozorhon, B., Arditi, D., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2008). Implications of culture in the performance of international construction joint venture. Journal of Constrruction Engineering and Management ASCE, 134(5), 361–370.

Palupie, Y. M. R., & Yuniarto, H. A. (2016). Alokasi risiko proyek infrastruktur dengan skema kerjasama pemerintah dan badan usaha (KPBU): Suatu tinjauan literatur. Seminar Nasional Teknik Industri Universitas Gadjah Mada, 96–103.

Ready, M. R. A., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2019). Analisis pembagian tanggung jawab pada proyek kerja sama operasi terhadap subkontraktor. Jurnal Konstruksia, 10(2), 1–20.

Shen, L. Y., Wu, G. W. C., & Ng, C. S. K. (2001). Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 76(February), 76–81.

Sufa’atin. (2017). Implementasi probability impact matriks (PIM) untuk mengidentifikasi kemungkinan dan dampak risiko proyek. Jurnal ULTIMA InfoSys, VIII(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v8i1.555

Tetteh, M. O., Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., & Nani, G. (2020). Factors affecting international construction joint ventures: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Construction Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1850203

Downloads

Published

2023-02-07

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 5 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Septian Rizki Pramono, Tri Joko Wahyu Adi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.