The Influence of Utilitarian, Hedonic, and E-Service Quality on Consumer Satisfaction Toward E-Grocery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i6.465Keywords:
utilitarian, hedonic, e-service quality, e-grocery, customer satisfactionAbstract
Digitalization has rapidly changed consumer behavior. People can easily buy items from the internet, including groceries, without having to pay for them. Due to this demand, several e-grocery platforms have emerged. High competition in the e-grocery industry is forcing the company to adopt a new marketing strategy. This study examined factors that might affect customer satisfaction with products or services provided by e-groceries. Moreover, the study was conducted to gather a more comprehensive view of online grocery purchasing in Indonesia by combining shopping value and e-service quality that impact customer satisfaction, repurchase intention, and e-WOM purchase and purchase value in Indonesia and the U.S. It shows that shopping value (utilitarian and hedonistic) and e-service quality have a positive impact on customer satisfaction. Moreover, if customer satisfaction is fulfilled, this leads to repurchase intentions and a positive word-of-mouth response to a customer's satisfaction level. A quantitative method was used in this study with the following criteria for respondents: they must live in Jabodetabek and have used e-grocery in the past three months. The data were simulated using the SMART PLS 4 software.
References
Andriani, N., Mugiono, M., & Rahayu, M. (2021). Utilitarian shopping value and hedonic shopping value to improve customer satisfaction and repurchase intention on e-commerce business. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(1), 166-174.
Blitstein, J. L., Frentz, F., & Jilcott Pitts, S. B. (2020). A mixed-method examination of reported benefits of online grocery shopping in the United States and Germany: Is health a factor?. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 26(3), 212-224.
Carpenter, J. M., & Moore, M. (2009). Utilitarian and hedonic shopping value in the US discount sector. Journal of retailing and Consumer Services, 16(1), 68-74.
Chang, H. H., Wang, Y. H., & Yang, W. Y. (2009). The impact of e-service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty on e-marketing: Moderating effect of perceived value. Total quality management, 20(4), 423-443.
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
Chung, J. B., Choi, B. C., Cho, Y. S., & Chung, L. C. (2016). Service quality of online grocery shopping in Korean local regions. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(8), 67-75.
Duarte, P., e Silva, S. C., & Ferreira, M. B. (2018). How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 161-169.
El-Adly, M. I., & Eid, R. (2017). Dimensions of the perceived value of malls: Muslim shoppers’ perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(1), 40-56.
Evelina, T. Y., Kusumawati, A., & Nimran, U. (2020). The influence of utilitarian value, hedonic value, social value, and perceived risk on customer satisfaction: Survey of e-commerce customers in Indonesia. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 613-622.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Gao, F. (2011, August). A study of online purchase intention: Based on the perspective of customer trust. In 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business research, 59(4), 449-456.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Handayani, P. W., Nurahmawati, R. A., Pinem, A. A., & Azzahro, F. (2020). Switching intention from traditional to online groceries using the moderating effect of gender in Indonesia. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 26(6), 425-439.
Henkel, D., Houchaime, N., Locatelli, N., & Singh, S. (2006). The impact of emerging WLANs on incumbent cellular service providers. McGraw-Hill.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140.
Hume, M., & Sullivan Mort, G. (2010). The consequence of appraisal emotion, service quality, perceived value and customer satisfaction on repurchase intent in the performing arts. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(2), 170-182.
Kahn, B. E. (2018). The shopping revolution: How successful retailers win customers in an era of endless disruption. Wharton School Press.
Kesari, B., & Atulkar, S. (2016). Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 31, 22-31.
Khristianto, W., & Suyadi, I. (2012). The influence of information, system, and service on customer satisfaction and loyalty in online shopping of forum jual beli Kaskus, Malang Region. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(2).
Kim, C., Galliers, R. D., Shin, N., Ryoo, J. H., & Kim, J. (2012). Factors influencing Internet shopping value and customer repurchase intention. Electronic commerce research and applications, 11(4), 374-387.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing management. Pearson Education.
Melis, K., Campo, K., Lamey, L., & Breugelmans, E. (2016). A bigger slice of the multichannel grocery pie: when does consumers’ online channel use expand retailers’ share of wallet?. Journal of Retailing, 92(3), 268-286.
Muhammad, N. S., Sujak, H., & Abd Rahman, S. (2016). Buying groceries online: The influences of electronic service quality (eServQual) and situational factors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 379-385.
Muharam, H., Chaniago, H., Endraria, E., & Harun, A. B. (2021). E-service quality, customer trust and satisfaction: market place consumer loyalty analysis. Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi, 8(2), 237-254.
Mustikasari, D. S., & Astuti, R. D. (2021, May). Factors affecting online grocery shopping experience. In International Conference on Business and Engineering Management (ICONBEM 2021) (pp. 18-24). Atlantis Press.
Mutum, D., Ghazali, E. M., Nguyen, B., & Arnott, D. (2014). Online loyalty and its interaction with switching barriers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(6), 942-949.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business research, 59(10-11), 1160-1166.
Pallas, F., Mittal, V., & Groening, C. (2014). Allocation of resources to customer satisfaction and delight based on utilitarian and hedonic benefits. Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(1), 106-112.
Pandiangan, S. M. T., Resmawa, I., Simanjuntak, O. D. P., Sitompul, P. N., & Jefri, R. (2021). Effect of e-satisfaction on repurchase intention in Shopee user students. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 7785-7791.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of service research, 7(3), 213-233.
Park, J. Y., & Thangam, D. (2019). What makes customers repurchase grocery products from online stores in Korea. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 15(4), 24-39.
Pramita, M. W., & Danibrata, A. (2021). Hedonic value dan utilitarian value terhadap customer satisfaction serta dampaknya terhadap behavior intentions. E-Jurnal Manajemen Trisakti School of Management (TSM), 1(1), 1-8.
Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A., Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., & Rahman, S. A. (2017). Testing a confirmatory model of Facebook usage in SmartPLS using consistent PLS. International Journal of Business and Innovation, 3(2), 1-14.
Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H., & Spence, M. T. (2006). Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of retail & distribution Management, 34(1), 6-24.
Rita, P., Oliveira, T., & Farisa, A. (2019). The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon, 5(10), e02690.
Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. (2010). Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast?casual restaurant industry. International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 22(3), 416-432.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Sheng, T., & Liu, C. (2010). An empirical study on the effect of e?service quality on online customer satisfaction and loyalty. Nankai business review international.
Singh, R., & Rosengren, S. (2020). Why do online grocery shoppers switch? An empirical investigation of drivers of switching in online grocery. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101962.
Singh, R., & Söderlund, M. (2020). Extending the experience construct: An examination of online grocery shopping. European Journal of Marketing.
Suhaily, L., & Soelasih, Y. (2017). What effects repurchase intention of online shopping. International Business Research, 10(12), 113-122.
Tandon, U., & Kiran, R. (2019). Factors impacting customer satisfaction: An empirical investigation into online shopping in India. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 21(1), 13-34.
To, P. L., Liao, C., & Lin, T. H. (2007). Shopping motivations on Internet: A study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation, 27(12), 774-787.
Turley, L. W., & Milliman, R. E. (2000). Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence. Journal of business research, 49(2), 193-211.
Wang, L., Law, R., Guillet, B. D., Hung, K., & Fong, D. K. C. (2015). Impact of hotel website quality on online booking intentions: eTrust as a mediator. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 47, 108-115.
Wu, J. J., Hwang, J. N., Sharkhuu, O., & Tsogt-Ochir, B. (2018). Shopping online and off-line? Complementary service quality and image congruence. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(1), 30-36.
Wu, W. Y., & Chang, M. L. (2007). The role of risk attitude on online shopping: Experience, customer satisfaction, and repurchase intention. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 35(4), 453-468.
Zainurrafiqi, Z., Amar, S. S., Rohmaniyah, R., Aristin, R., Muchtar, R. M., Rusnani, R., ... & Hidayati, N. (2021). The effect of utilitarian value and hedonic value on customer loyalty with customer satisfaction as an intervening variable: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(5), 291-305.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30(4), 362-375.
Zeng, F., Hu, Z., Chen, R., & Yang, Z. (2009). Determinants of online service satisfaction and their impacts on behavioural intentions. Total Quality Management, 20(9), 953-969.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yoshua Kolondam, Edwin Reynaldi, Kirana Ariesta Darmawan, Rini Setiowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
