The Effect of Corruption Prevention Efforts with Regional Corruption Cases and Complaints

Authors

  • Dwi Aprillia Linda Astuti School of Business, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, West Java
  • Joyo Winoto School of Business, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, West Java
  • Suprehatin Suprehatin Faculty of Economics and Business, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, West Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i10.573

Keywords:

monitoring center for prevention, prevention of corruption, regional corruption

Abstract

One of the obstacles in the business sector in Indonesia is corruption. Efforts to eradicate corruption are carried out through education, prevention and prosecution strategies or known as the TRISULA strategy. One of the corruption prevention efforts carried out by the KPK is through the Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) with eight areas. This study aims to analyze the relationship between prevention and complaints and regional corruption cases. This study uses secondary data. Secondary data consists of the Regional Corruption Prevention Index, complaints, and regional corruption cases handled by the KPK in 34 provinces in Indonesia, 2018 – 2022. Primary data was obtained through a survey with purposive sampling in 22 local governments. Data were analyzed using regression analysis with e-VIEWS software. The results of the study show that the areas of prevention that have an influence on corruption complaints are planning and budgeting, procurement of goods and services, supervision of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), and management of regional property. The prevention area that has an influence on corruption cases is the procurement of goods and services.

References

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Patterson Smith.

Fuat, M. (2013). Kendala penyidik mengubah bukti audit menjadi bukti hukum dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Pusdiklatwas BPKP.

Ilham, M., Ismansyah, I., & Fitriati, F. (2022). Penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi dengan alat bukti surat berbentuk fotocopy. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v5i4.233

KPK. (2023, February 2). Pentingnya pengaduan masyarakat bagi upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi.

Kratcoski, P. C. (2018). Fraud and corruption: Major types, prevention and control. Springer International Publishing AG.

Lutfi, A. F., Zainuri, Z., & Diartho, H. C. (2020). Dampak korupsi terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi: Studi kasus 4 negara di ASEAN. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.19184/ejeba.v7i1.16482

Nawatmi, S. (2014). Korupsi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi negara-negara Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 21(1).

Olsen, W. (2010). The anti-corruption handbook: How to protect your business in the global marketplace. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Pope, J. (2003). Strategi memberantas korupsi: Elemen sistem integritas nasional. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Rodliyya, Z. R., & Adrison, V. (2022). Pengaruh penanganan kasus korupsi terhadap aduan masyarakat kepada KPK. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 165–176.

Sidi, R. (2019). Corruption Prevention Efforts with Non Penal Policy. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33258/biarjohs.v1i1.10

TI Indonesia. (2023, January 31). Indeks persepsi korupsi Indonesia 2022. Transparency International Indonesia.

Tua, M., & Mahi, B. R. (2022). Analysis of the effect of corruption prevention on private investment at the district/city level in Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 247–258.

Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Sunaryo, A. (2017). The role of prosecutor office in the eradication of corruption criminal acts in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i2.1701

World Bank. (2021). Ease of doing business rank (1=most business-friendly regulations). The World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-26