Analysis of state administrative court procedural law: A recent review and its practical implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i8.870Keywords:
administrative procedure law, recent review, implicationsAbstract
In Indonesia, the Administrative Court Procedure (ATUN) is a vital law enforcement tool that resolves disputes between government and citizens or between government agencies. This article aims to provide in-depth insight into the dynamics of ATUN, as well as explore its practical implications in the context of state administration law enforcement in Indonesia. The research method utilized is normative juridical as the main approach to analyzing and evaluating the legal framework governing ATUN. The next step is to identify problems that arise in ATUN and analyze the applicable legal norms, both regulations and court decisions, and draw conclusions and practical implications from these findings. The results show that ATUN has undergone changes that have a positive impact on strengthening the enforcement of justice in the State Administrative Court field. With the adoption of technology, the speed, accuracy, and reliability in handling administrative cases has improved significantly. Finally, mediation has also become a more efficient alternative in resolving disputes, providing faster solutions and more affordable costs compared to conventional judicial processes.
References
Akbar, M. K. (2021). Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mweujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Dharmasisya, 1(1).
Al Amin, A. Y., & Wibowo, A. (2023). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.111
Astomo, P. (2014). Eksistensi Peradilan Administrasi Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 1(1).
Asyiah, N. (2016). Eksitensi Perlindungan Hukum Warga Negara Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah Dalam Membuat Keputusan Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 11(1), 44–54.
Dahlan, K., & Chandra, A. E. (2021). Kedudukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara Sebagai Upaya Dalam Mendorong Terbentuknya Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Jurnal Justisia?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v6i1.10609
Harjiyatni, F. R., & Suswoto, S. (2017). IMPLIKASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN TERHADAP FUNGSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art5
Iqbal, M., Susanto, S., & Sutoro, M. (2019). EFEKTIFITAS SISTEM ADMINISTRASI E-COURT DALAM UPAYA MENDUKUNG PROSES ADMINISTRASI CEPAT, SEDERHANA DAN BIAYA RINGAN DI PENGADILAN. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i2.7286
Khoiriyyah, N. N. (2022). Studi Analisis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v3i6.443
Mulyani, T., Sukimin, S., & Wijaya, W. S. W. P. (2022). Konsep Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Berbasiskan Nilai Keadilan Pancasila. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v10i1.5773
Prasetyo, V. N., Rasji, R., & Safitri, Y. (2022). Sistem Pembuktian pada Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. COMSERVA?: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i8.475
Puspitosari, H. (2014). Mediasi Dalam Rangka Asas Peradilan Cepat Biaya Murah Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Terjadinya Sengketa Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Ratu Adil, 3(2).
Safitri, E. D., & Sa’adah, N. (2021). Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45
Sardari, A. A. (2022). Peradilan Dan Pengadilan Dalam Konsep Dasar, Perbedaan Dan Dasar Hukum. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1), 11–23.
Setiawan, A. D., Artaji, & Sherly Ayuna Putri. (2021). IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM E-COURT DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v2i2.352
Shalla, M. A. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Banda Aceh Pada Sengketa Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Nomor Perkara 2/G/Ki/2018/Ptun.Bna [Doctoral Dissertation]. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
Simamora, J. (2014). TAFSIR MAKNA NEGARA HUKUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.318
Simanjuntak, E. (2021). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. Sinar Grafika.
Siska, L., Fitriayany, L., & Azmi, K. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kebijakan Pemerintah Terhadap Keputusan Muzakki Berzakat di Baznas Kota Dumai. Al-Hisbah Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.57113/his.v2i2.54
Somantri, D. (2021). Tantangan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Memperkuat Kewibawaan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 4(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anom Anom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
