Analysis of the Quality of Subdistrict Integrated Administration Services (PATEN)

Authors

  • Asnar Asnar Faculty of Teaching and Educational Science, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i8.874

Keywords:

administration, quality, patent enforcement

Abstract

The study analyzed the quality of Subdistrict Integrated Administration Service Delivery (PATEN) at the Samarinda Ilir District Office in Samarinda City, focusing on its supporting and inhibiting factors. The research used a qualitative approach, including purposive and accidental sampling techniques, in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and documentation studies. The results showed good patent implementation quality, as measured by the five dimensions of public service quality analysis: reliability, responsiveness, certainty, empathy, and tangibility. Supporting factors included adequate office service facilities, air conditioning, television, and comfortable seating. However, the inhibiting factor was the lack of informal socialization among the community. The study also highlighted the management of licensing services in the sub-district, following laws and regulations.

References

Abdou, A. M. (2021). Good governance and COVID-19: The digital bureaucracy to response the pandemic (Singapore as a model). Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2656

Abhayawansa, S., Adams, C. A., & Neesham, C. (2021). Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how governments create value. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4667

Arfan, S., Mayarni, M., & Nasution, M. S. (2021). Responsivity of Public Services in Indonesia during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1638

Farida, I., Lampung, U. B., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, N. (2020). The Implementation of E-Government in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT, 22(2).

Fauzi, N., & Zakaria, R. Y. (2000). Democratizing Decentralization?: Local Initiatives from Indonesia. The International Association for the Study of Common Property 9th Biennial Conference, Zimbabwe.

Flores, R. B. (2017). Decentralization and local governance in Southeast Asia: A passing review of development, reforms and approaches. Journal of Politics and Governance, 7(1).

Haque, M. S. (2010). Decentralizing local governance in Thailand: Contemporary trends and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.514443

Harijanti, S. D. (2020). Complaint Handling Systems In The Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis Between Indonesia and Australia. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v3i1.11454

Haryono, B. S., Nugroho, A. A., Putera, F., & Noor, I. (2024). Narrative policy of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia: Rules of narrative in mass media. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i1.2842

Jan, A. A., Lai, F. W., & Tahir, M. (2021). Developing an Islamic Corporate Governance framework to examine sustainability performance in Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099

Keerasuntonpong, P., Manowan, P., & Shutibhinyo, W. (2019). Reforming government public accountability: the case of Thailand. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2018-0051

Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Mamode Khan, N. (2022). The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2021-0298

Ngatikoh, S., Kumorotomo, W., & Retnandari, N. D. (2020). Transparency in Government: A Review on the Failures of Corruption Prevention in Indonesia. Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration (IAPA 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200301.010

Schwarz, G., Eva, N., & Newman, A. (2020). Can Public Leadership Increase Public Service Motivation and Job Performance? Public Administration Review, 80(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182

Susanto, S. (2020). E-COURT AS THE PREVENTION EFFORTS AGAINST THE INDONESIA JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.41127

Utomo, T. W. W. (2011). Building Good Governance through Decentralization in Indonesia (Recognizing Some Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation Stage). Limits of Good Governance in Developing Countries, 1998.

Wijayanti, Y., & Fathurrahman, R. (2024). Opportunities And Challenges For Decentralized Governments In The Globalization Era: Lessons From Indonesia. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i7.620

Zerbian, T., & de Luis Romero, E. (2023). The role of cities in good governance for food security: lessons from Madrid’s urban food strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1873174

Downloads

Published

2024-05-25