Normative construction of restorative justice implementation in accelerating state losses return in corruption crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i9.898Keywords:
Normative Construction, Restitution of State Losses, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The objective of this study is to explore the philosophical foundation for the application of restorative justice approaches in cases of corruption in Indonesia. The study aims to examine and analyze the success related to efforts to reclaim and take back state financial reimbursement due to corruption based on the provisions of Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning eradication of corruption crimes, which is mainly carried out by the process of confiscating the assets of the suspect's wealth which are found to have a relationship and link and match relationship with the suspect and his corruption crime. The research is intended to explore and discuss the shortcomings and challenges, both substantive and formal, in asset seizure for state recovery, as well as the analysis of the success of recovering substitute money in combating corruption crimes. Based on the research, it is concluded that the philosophy of Pancasila as a source of values derived from its five principles to guide the enforcement of law in Indonesia can be employed to examine Indonesian law.
References
Afif, A. (2015). Pemaafan, Rekonsiliasi & Restorative Justice. Pustaka Pelajar.
Alkostar, A. (2013). Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crime. Training Pengarusutamaan Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Bagi Hakim Seluruh Indonesia, 1.
Amrullah, R., & Naramiharja, R. (2020). Asset Recoveryin in the Criminal Act of Corruption in ASEAN. Simbur Cahaya, 27(1).
Arief, N. B. (1998). Strategi Kebijakan Nasional Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Indonesia (Analisa Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1971). Universitas Diponegoro.
Arinanto, S., & Triyanti, N. (2011). Memahami Hukum: Dari Konstruksi Sampai Implementasi. Rajawali Press.
Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi: Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional. Mandar Maju.
Atmoko, D., & Syauket, A. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Dampak Serta Upaya Pemberantasan. Binamulia Hukum, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i2.732
Austin, J. (1995). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge University Press.
Barkatullah, A. H., & Prasetyo, T. (2005). Politik Hukum Pidana: Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Bey, F. (2016). Sejarah Viktimologi. Prosiding Pelatihan Viktimologi Indonesia.
Budianto, A., Rato, D., Anggono, B. D., & Setyawan, F. (2022). Restorative Justice: Positivization of Customary Law in Resolving Land Disputes Based on Local Wisdom of Papuan Citizens. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 127, 1.
Campbell, D. (2011). The Province of Jurisprudence Demolished. Social and Legal Studies, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910394741
Cassella, S. D. (2006). Recovering the proceeds of crime from the correspondent account of a foreign bank. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/13685200610707644
Friedman, L. (1975). The Legal System: A Sosial Science Perspective. Russel Sage Foundation.
Hamzah, A. (1986). Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, dari Retribusi ke Reformasi. Pradnya Paramita.
Hartika, L., Dithisari, I., & Andriati, S. L. (2022). Urgensi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Oleh Jaksa Eksekutor Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Binamulia Hukum, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i2.709
Hartono, H. (2012). Penyidikan & Penegakan Hukum Pidana Melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika.
HR, R. (2014). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali Press.
Husin, A. (2020). The Settlement of Corruption Case Using Restorative Justice in Indonesia’s Criminal Law. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(2).
Jha, U. C. (2014). Armed Conflict and Environmental Damage. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd.
Kennedy, A. (2007). An evaluation of the recovery of criminal proceeds in the United Kingdom. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/13685200710721854
Kulsum, U. (2008). Kebijakan Indonesia Meratifikasi United Nations Convention Againts Corruption (UNCAC). Universitas Jember.
Kusumaatmadja, M., & Sidharta, A. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Alumni.
Lubis, M. S. (2008). Hukum Tatanegara. Mandar Maju.
Mahmud, A. (2018). PROBLEMATIKA ASSET RECOVERY DALAM PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA AKIBAT TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262
McGarvey, K. (2019). Where Can Philosophical Thinking Help? Everywhere. Rochester.
Muladi, M. (2006). Konsep Total Enforcement dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Kerangka Politik Hukum.
Penner, J. E., Schiff, D., & Nobles, R. (2002). Introduction to Jurisprudence and Legal Theory Commentary and Materials. Oxford University Press.
Purbopranoto, K. (1985). Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintaan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Alumni.
Rizal, M., Ghufron, N., & Furqoni, L. (2013). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Unsur Melawan Hukum Dalam Putusan Bebas Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pembangunan Jalan Lingkar Manyar Banyuwangi (Putusan Nomor. 596/pid. b/2009/pn. bwi) (Artikel Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa). UNEJ.
Salam, B. (1988). Filsafat Manusia: Antropologi Metafisika. Bina Aksara.
Septiadi, A. (2018). Pidana Uang Pengganti Koruptor Tak Sebanding Dengan Kerugian Negara. Nasional Kontan News.
Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Inkpen, N., Newbury-Birch, D., Rossner, M., Angel, C., Mearns, M., & Slothower, M. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: the Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9247-6
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2009). Menghitung kerugian keuangan negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Penerbit Salemba.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arip Zahrulyani, M. Iman Santoso, Irfan Ridwan Maksum, Siswantari Pratiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
