Legal politics of criminal law against the revival of death penalty as an alternative punishment in the new criminal code

Authors

  • Abdul Kadir Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Tangerang, Banten
  • Faisal Santiago Universitas Borobudur, East Jakarta, Jakarta
  • Suparji Achmad Universitas Borobudur, East Jakarta, Jakarta
  • Ahmad Redi Universitas Borobudur, East Jakarta, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i9.902

Keywords:

politics of criminal law, punishment, death penalty, new criminal code

Abstract

The reform of the death penalty into an alternative crime in the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023 pertaining to the Criminal Code) is a long-standing agenda that has been launched by the Indonesian Government. This paper aims to analyze how Indonesian criminal law is currently enforced to determine how it will be implemented in the future. This research focuses on the politics of criminal law and basic freedoms regarding the reform of capital punishment into an alternate crime in Law No. 1 of the Republic of Indonesia (KUHP) 2023. The study is based on literature studies and documentation. The results of this study show that, despite the fact that KUHP is primarily intended to protect society, its application should be cautious and targeted at the offender; consequently, it must be selective, and there should be provisions for conditional death sentences or delaying the execution of the penalty.

References

Archer, D., Gartner, R., & Beittel, M. (1983). Homicide and the death penalty: A cross-national test of a deterrence hypothesis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1143141

Arief, B. N. (2003). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hadikusuma, H. (1989). Hukum Pidana Adat. Alumni.

Harwanto, E. R. (2019). Politik Hukum Pidana. Sai Wawai Publishing.

Hiarej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

MD, Moh. M. (2010). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Rajawali Press.

Prasetyo, A. (2023). Kerancuan Aturan Hukuman Mati di KUHP Baru. Hukum Online.

Raharjo, A. (2002). Cybercrime: Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rizal, Moch. C., & Rachmatulloh, M. A. (2023). Pidana Mati: Tinjauan KUHP 2023 dan Konsepsi HAM. Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana, Pusat Studi HAM Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kediri.

Sahetapy, J. E. (2009). Pidana Mati Dalam Negara Pancasila. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soehino, S. (2010). Politik Hukum di Indonesia. BPFE Yogyakarta.

Soekanto, S., & Mahmudhi, S. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarto, S. (1986). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Bina Cipta.

Teguh, O., & Purba, S. P. (2021). PENJATUHAN PIDANA MATI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA DAN DITINJAU DARI SUDUT PANDANG HAM. JURNAL RECTUM, 3(2).

Widayati, L. S. (2017). Pidana Mati Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Perlukah Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?(Death Penalty In The Bill Of Criminal Code: Should Regulated As A Special Punishment?). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 7(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25