Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2022 concerning electronic mediation in the jurisdiction of The Denpasar District Court

Authors

  • Ni Putu Laria Dewi Universitas Mahendradatta
  • Erikson Sihotang Universitas Mahendradatta
  • Komang Edy Dharma Saputra Universitas Mahendradatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i11.984

Keywords:

Electronic Mediation, Supreme Court Regulations, District Courts

Abstract

The integration of electronic systems into the judicial process represents a significant advancement in legal practice. The advent of e-Court and electronic mediation represent a broader trend towards integrating technology to improve the efficiency and reach of judicial processes. This study aims to find out the stages of implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2022 concerning Electronic Mediation in the jurisdiction of the Denpasar District Court, and the inhibiting factors of the implementation of the regulation in this jurisdiction. The study provides valuable insights into the practical application of electronic mediation, highlights challenges faced in the field, and offers recommendations for improving the regulatory process and overcoming obstacles. This research could evaluate how legal representatives support parties in fulfilling their rights and obligations during electronic mediation. Additionally, investigating the specific obstacles related to software and human resources could provide insights into how these challenges impact the mediation process.

References

Baried, R. R. (2023). The Influence of the Digital Age on the Development of Private Procedure Law in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_13

Branting, K., McLeod, S., Howell, S., Weiss, B., Profitt, B., Tanner, J., Gross, I., & Shin, D. (2023). A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09318-7

Contini, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings. Law, Technology and Humans, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478

Cortés, P. (2023). Embedding alternative dispute resolution in the civil justice system: a taxonomy for ADR referrals and a digital pathway to increase the uptake of ADR. Legal Studies, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.42

Grill, A. K., & Martin, E. (2021). The impact of EU law on international commercial mediation. In International Arbitration and EU Law. Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974004.00032

Hikmah, N. (2023). ELECTRONIC MEDIATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR FULFILLING MEDIATION ARRANGEMENTS IN COURT. IJECK (International Journal of Economy, Computer, Law, Management and Communication), 1(3).

Indonesia’s Department of Education. (2002). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.

Lederer, F. I. (2021). The evolving technology-augmented courtroom before, during, and after the pandemic. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 23(2).

Lohvinenko, M., Starynskyi, M., Rudenko, L., & Kordunian, I. (2021). Models of mediation: Theoretical and legal analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21315

Mursyid, B. T. A. (2023). Effectiveness of Online Mediation Application on Divorce Cases Due to Economic Factors. Musamus Law Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v5i2.5050

Nafisah, D., Fadil, F., & Hidayah, K. (2022). Virtual mediation in Islamic religious civil cases Soerjono Soekanto theory of law enforcement perspective. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2).

Nisa, A. K. (2023). The Effectiveness of Implementing the Supreme Court Ordinance Number 3 of 2022 on Electronic Mediation in Courts. LEGAL BRIEF, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i1.731

PAW?OWSKA, E., WITKOWSKI, P., & TRYBUS, P. (2021). Mediation as an innovative dispute resolution tool based on the example of public organizations. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2021(150), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2021.150.13

Prescott, J. J. (2017). Improving access to justice in state courts with platform technology. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70(6).

Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367

Simorangkir, J. C. T. (2004). Kamus Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, S. (2016). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Susanti, A. N. (2007). Naskah Akademis Mediasi. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Zaidah, Y., & Normas, M. R. (2022). Mediasi Online Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Era Pandemi. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v5i3.5847

Zarnow, Z., & Hirsch, D. E. (2021). Inflection Point: Can Courts Use Technology to Spur Transformational Change or Will They Return to the Traditional Way of Doing Business? Georgetown Law Journal, 5(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-08-25